Rotary and radial forcing effects on center-of-mass locomotion dynamics.

作者: Z H Shen , P L Larson , J E Seipel

DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/036020

关键词: EngineeringInverted pendulumControl theorySymmetry (physics)Forcing (recursion theory)Poison controlStability (probability)PropulsionGait (human)Constant (mathematics)

摘要: Rotary and radial forcing are two common actuation methods for legged robots. However, these orthogonal of center-of-mass (CoM) have not been compared as potentially alternative strategies actuation. In this paper, we compare the CoM stability energetics running with rotary through simulation models: rotary-forced spring-loaded inverted pendulum (rotary-forced-SLIP), radially-forced-SLIP. We model both in simplest way, applying them a constant force during stance portion gait. A simple application throughout is capable producing fully-asymptotically stable motion; however, similarly solutions. then allow applied functions to turn on or off based occurrence mid-stance event, which breaks symmetry towards net forward propulsion. find that first half second stance, stabilizing running. Interestingly, improve motion different ways. reduces greatly increases size parameter region when gradually increased. Radial expands region, but only moderate way. Also, it found stabilized by largely complementary. Overall, can better stabilize event-based were attempted. This indicates has an inherent capability running, even minimal time-or-event-or-state feedback present. forcing, tends be more energy efficient forcing. addition, balanced efficiency achieved combining methods. These results may future study how animals move.

参考文章(32)
Daniel E. Koditschek, William John Schwind, Spring loaded inverted pendulum running: a plant model PhD thesis. ,(1998)
R. McNeill Alexander, Principles of Animal Locomotion ,(2003)
Uluc Saranli, Martin Buehler, Daniel E. Koditschek, RHex: A Simple and Highly Mobile Hexapod Robot: The International Journal of Robotics Research. ,vol. 20, pp. 616- 631 ,(2001) , 10.1177/02783640122067570
Z H Shen, J E Seipel, A fundamental mechanism of legged locomotion with hip torque and leg damping. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. ,vol. 7, pp. 046010- ,(2012) , 10.1088/1748-3182/7/4/046010
Philip Holmes, Robert J. Full, Dan Koditschek, John Guckenheimer, The Dynamics of Legged Locomotion: Models, Analyses, and Challenges SIAM Review. ,vol. 48, pp. 207- 304 ,(2006) , 10.1137/S0036144504445133
Y Blum, S W Lipfert, J Rummel, A Seyfarth, Swing leg control in human running. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. ,vol. 5, pp. 026006- ,(2010) , 10.1088/1748-3182/5/2/026006
Arthur D Kuo, None, Energetics of Actively Powered Locomotion Using the Simplest Walking Model Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-transactions of The Asme. ,vol. 124, pp. 113- 120 ,(2002) , 10.1115/1.1427703
Son Kuswadi, Aki Ohnishi, Akiko Takahashi, Mitsuji Sampei, Shigeki Nakaura, A one linear actuator hopping robot : modeling and control Advanced Robotics. ,vol. 17, pp. 709- 737 ,(2003) , 10.1163/156855303322395172
S. Grimmer, M. Ernst, M. Gunther, R. Blickhan, Running on uneven ground: leg adjustment to vertical steps and self-stability The Journal of Experimental Biology. ,vol. 211, pp. 2989- 3000 ,(2008) , 10.1242/JEB.014357
A. J. Spence, S. Revzen, J. Seipel, C. Mullens, R. J. Full, Insects running on elastic surfaces The Journal of Experimental Biology. ,vol. 213, pp. 1907- 1920 ,(2010) , 10.1242/JEB.042515