Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era

作者: Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl , Małgorzata Ćwiek

DOI: 10.3390/SU13105759

关键词: Knowledge transferKnowledge managementKnowledge workerOpenness to experienceSustainabilityScientific literatureDigital RevolutionProcess (engineering)PsychologyCompetence (human resources)

摘要: The digital revolution has triggered disproportions resulting from unequal access to knowledge and various related skills, because the constituting new civilization is based on specific, high-context, personalized professional knowledge. In response these dependencies, in line with sustainability paradigm, issue of diffusion knowledge, especially type, particular importance eliminating increasing inequalities. Therefore, main challenge stimulate free dispersion intellectual workers’ Their openness commitment, devoid opportunistic knowledge-flow restraining attitudes, are prerequisites for development a sustainable society (synonymous Civilization 5.0 or Humanity 5.0). article endeavors verify trust as leading factor effective specialist exchange. Its purpose analyze diagnose components, enablers, types that affect specific forms different groups organizational stakeholders treated agents. Systematic scientific literature analysis, expert evaluation, structured questionnaires were used develop hypotheses. Direct semistructured individual interviews, focus-group online computer-assisted telephone web interviews also applied paper. research results confirmed assumption reliability-based trust, built competence-based reinforced by benevolence-based foundation exchange It supported hypotheses this process depends group agents, dominant form well its enhancers exchanged Conducted explorations constitute theoretical practical contribution subject They fill gap regarding vehicles provide general, guidelines terms shaping components competence-, benevolence-, due type transferred agents involved circulation.

参考文章(111)
Naim Hamdija Afgan, Maria G Carvalho, The Knowledge Society: A Sustainability Paradigm Cadmus. ,vol. 1, pp. 28- 41 ,(2010)
J. Paliszkiewicz, Trust between managers and subordinates: understanding the effects Management and Production Engineering Review. pp. 34- 39 ,(2011)
Thomas H. Davenport, Thinking for a living : how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers Harvard Business School Press. ,(2005)
Michael E. Gorman, Types of Knowledge and Their Roles in Technology Transfer Journal of Technology Transfer. ,vol. 27, pp. 219- 231 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1015672119590
Allam Ahmed, Amer Al-Roubaie, Building a knowledge-based economy in the Muslim world World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development. ,vol. 9, pp. 76- 98 ,(2012) , 10.1108/20425941211244243
Rory Donnelly, How “free” is the free worker? Personnel Review. ,vol. 35, pp. 78- 97 ,(2006) , 10.1108/00483480610636803
Ian F. Wilkinson, Yimin Stephanie Huang, A Case study of the development of trust in a business relation: implications for a dynamic theory of trust Journal of Business Market Management. ,vol. 7, pp. 254- 279 ,(2014)
Heidi Olander, Mika Vanhala, Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Kirsimarja Blomqvist, HR-related Knowledge Protection and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Trust Knowledge and Process Management. ,vol. 22, pp. 220- 233 ,(2015) , 10.1002/KPM.1476
Linda Argote, Paul Ingram, KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 82, pp. 150- 169 ,(2000) , 10.1006/OBHD.2000.2893