Context matters: Context-related drivers of and barriers to climate information use

作者: Julia A. Flagg , Christine J. Kirchhoff

DOI: 10.1016/J.CRM.2018.01.003

关键词: Micro levelBusinessOrganizing principleMacroAdaptation (computer science)PoliticsPublic economicsContext (language use)Conceptual modelMacro level

摘要: Abstract This review addresses a critical research gap concerning why climate information (CI) is used (or not) and contributes to narrowing the knowledge-action improve adaptation. The article reviews on factors that are endemic context of CI use can influence whether happens. It synthesizes promote or impede at three levels social aggregation: micro, meso, macro levels. organizing principle enables consideration nested layers comprise use. micro level consists smallest aggregation, individuals who do not use) CI. meso larger aggregates, organizations, with leadership, decision-making processes, technical human capacity Finally, comprised political environment in which organizations operate, may be more less supportive Though focused water management, implications much broader. A conceptual model introduced help explain how shapes While interactions between producers users ways see happens, only happens if elements contexts align support That is, even when best conditions for exist, these alone insufficient stymies use, reasons due organizational dynamics. By attending context, this new shows where strategically invest supporting

参考文章(54)
Laura Briley, Daniel Brown, Scott E. Kalafatis, Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making Climate Risk Management. ,vol. 9, pp. 41- 49 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.CRM.2015.04.004
Christine J. Kirchhoff, Rebecca Esselman, Daniel Brown, Boundary organizations to boundary chains: Prospects for advancing climate science application Climate Risk Management. ,vol. 9, pp. 20- 29 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.CRM.2015.04.001
Catherine Vaughan, Suraje Dessai, Climate services for society: origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. ,vol. 5, pp. 587- 603 ,(2014) , 10.1002/WCC.290
Louise W. Bedsworth, Ellen Hanak, Adaptation to Climate Change: A Review of Challenges and Tradeoffs in Six Areas Journal of The American Planning Association. ,vol. 76, pp. 477- 495 ,(2010) , 10.1080/01944363.2010.502047
Nathan L. Engle, Adaptation Bridges and Barriers in Water Planning and Management: Insight from Recent Extreme Droughts in Arizona and Georgia1 JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. ,vol. 48, pp. 1139- 1150 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1752-1688.2012.00676.X
Christopher B. Barrett, Brent M. Swallow, Fractal Poverty Traps World Development. ,vol. 34, pp. 1- 15 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2005.06.008
Robert E. O'Connor, Brent Yarnal, Kirstin Dow, Christine L. Jocoy, Gregory J. Carbone, Feeling at Risk Matters: Water Managers and the Decision to Use Forecasts Risk Analysis. ,vol. 25, pp. 1265- 1275 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2005.00675.X
R. H. Moss, G. A. Meehl, M. C. Lemos, J. B. Smith, J. R. Arnold, J. C. Arnott, D. Behar, G. P. Brasseur, S. B. Broomell, A. J. Busalacchi, S. Dessai, K. L. Ebi, J. A. Edmonds, J. Furlow, L. Goddard, H. C. Hartmann, J. W. Hurrell, J. W. Katzenberger, D. M. Liverman, P. W. Mote, S. C. Moser, A. Kumar, R. S. Pulwarty, E. A. Seyller, B. L. Turner, W. M. Washington, T. J. Wilbanks, Hell and High Water: Practice-Relevant Adaptation Science Science. ,vol. 342, pp. 696- 698 ,(2013) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1239569
Linda Stalker Prokopy, J. Stuart Carlton, J. Gordon Arbuckle, Tonya Haigh, Maria Carmen Lemos, Amber Saylor Mase, Nicholas Babin, Mike Dunn, Jeff Andresen, Jim Angel, Chad Hart, Rebecca Power, Extension′s role in disseminating information about climate change to agricultural stakeholders in the United States Climatic Change. ,vol. 130, pp. 261- 272 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10584-015-1339-9