Back to the Future? Behavioral IR as a Case of Arrested Development

作者: STEPHEN G. WALKER

DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-2486.2007.00669_3.X

关键词: Unit of analysisConflict resolutionConflict managementDyadInternational studiesEpistemologyExpected utility hypothesisRationalityPsychologySocial psychologyEmpirical research

摘要: Alex Mintz calls in his essay this Forum for recognizing “Behavioral IR” as a subfield the study of IR. He rests case on existence “numerous anomalies from traditional analytic, rational, expected utility model choice” research political science and A combination favorable methodological developments historical conditions has combined to create bright future Behavioral IR subfield. If promise is fulfilled, then may come focus dyad micro-structural unit analysis with models bounded strategic rationality informed by content analyses beliefs other psychological characteristics leaders these dyads (Herrmann Fischerkeller 1995; Lake Powell 1999; Wendt Walker 2004). Some will point out no doubt that existed since 1960s its members publishing outlets such Journal Conflict Resolution, International Interactions, Peace Research, Management Science , Studies Quarterly . What new opportunity increase explained variance studies including explicit measurement contextual tested literature. It now cost effective combine within single design independent variables achieve more robust results (Schafer 2000; Post 2005; Schafer 2006). The gap between rational choice empirical decision making also shrink result use tools are available gathering information about individual makers. The “world their minds” …

参考文章(56)
Ernest H Forman, Mary Ann Selly, Decision by Objectives Research Papers in Economics. ,(2001) , 10.1142/4281
Valerie M. Hudson, Eric Singer, Political Psychology And Foreign Policy ,(1992)
Erik Melander, Regime Legitimacy and Intrastate Armed Conflict : Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, 1-5. March, Honolulu, HI. The 46th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, 1-5. March, Honolulu, HI.. ,(2005)
James N. Rosenau, Klaus Eugen Knorr, Contending Approaches to International Politics Princeton University Press. ,(2017)
Alex Mintz, Steven B Redd, Framing effects in international relations Synthese. ,vol. 135, pp. 193- 213 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1023460923628
David A. Lake, Robert Powell, Strategic choice and international relations Princeton University Press. ,(1999)