Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.

作者: Mohit N Shivdasani , Nicholas C Sinclair , Peter N Dimitrov , Mary Varsamidis , Lauren N Ayton

DOI: 10.1167/IOVS.14-14396

关键词: Visual prosthesisBiomedical engineeringRetinal ProsthesisPulse repetition frequencySurgeryElectrodePulse-width modulationPsychophysicsMaterials scienceRetinaRetinal

摘要: PURPOSE The suprachoroidal location for a retinal prosthesis provides advantages over other locations in terms of simplified surgical procedure and potentially more stable electrode-neural interface. aim this study was to assess the factors affecting perceptual thresholds, optimize stimulus parameters achieve lowest thresholds patients implanted with prosthesis. METHODS Three profound vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa were array. Perceptual measured on individual electrodes analyzed as function (return configuration, pulse polarity, width, interphase gap, rate), electrode (area number ganged electrodes), clinical (retinal thickness electrode-retina distance) parameters. RESULTS A total 92.8% 904 measurements made up 680 days post implantation yielded (range, 44-436 nanocoulombs [nC]) below safe charge limit. Thresholds found vary between individuals depend significantly distance, negligibly thickness, not area or electrodes. Lowest achieved when using monopolar return, anodic-first short widths (100 μs) combined long gaps (500 μs), high stimulation rates (≥400 pulses per second [pps]). CONCLUSIONS With stimulation, return are most efficacious. To enable rates, an appropriate combination width gap must be chosen ensure low voltages. Electrode-retina distance needs monitored carefully owing its influence thresholds. These results inform implantable stimulator specifications (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01603576.).

参考文章(73)
K. Stingl, K.U. Bartz-Schmidt, D. Besch, F. Gekeler, U. Greppmaier, G. Hörtdörfer, A. Koitschev, T. Peters, H. Sachs, B. Wilhelm, E. Zrenner, Was können blinde Patienten mit dem subretinalen Alpha-IMS-Implantat im Alltag sehen? Ophthalmologe. ,vol. 109, pp. 136- 141 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00347-011-2479-6
Katarina Stingl, Michael Bach, Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Angelika Braun, Anna Bruckmann, Florian Gekeler, Udo Greppmaier, Gernot Hörtdörfer, Akos Kusnyerik, Tobias Peters, Barbara Wilhelm, Robert Wilke, Eberhart Zrenner, Safety and efficacy of subretinal visual implants in humans: methodological aspects Clinical and Experimental Optometry. ,vol. 96, pp. 4- 13 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1444-0938.2012.00816.X
Lloyd Kaufman, James P. Thomas, Kenneth R. Boff, Handbook of perception and human performance Wiley. ,(1986)
Julie Arenberg Bierer, John C. Middlebrooks, Auditory Cortical Images of Cochlear-Implant Stimuli: Dependence on Electrode Configuration Journal of Neurophysiology. ,vol. 87, pp. 478- 492 ,(2002) , 10.1152/JN.00212.2001
Changsi Cai, Perry Twyford, Shelley Fried, The response of retinal neurons to high-frequency stimulation Journal of Neural Engineering. ,vol. 10, pp. 036009- 036009 ,(2013) , 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036009
S. I. Fried, H. A. Hsueh, F. S. Werblin, A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology. ,vol. 95, pp. 970- 978 ,(2006) , 10.1152/JN.00849.2005
George M. Gerken, Vishwa K. H. Bhat, Margaret Hutchison‐Clutter, Auditory temporal integration and the power function model Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 88, pp. 767- 778 ,(1990) , 10.1121/1.399726
Lauren N. Ayton, Nicholas V. Apollo, Mary Varsamidis, Peter N. Dimitrov, Robyn H. Guymer, Chi D. Luu, Assessing residual visual function in severe vision loss. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 55, pp. 1332- 1338 ,(2014) , 10.1167/IOVS.13-12657