Melancholic, atypical and anxious depression subtypes and outcome of treatment with escitalopram and nortriptyline

作者: Rudolf Uher , Mojca Zvezdana Dernovsek , Ole Mors , Joanna Hauser , Daniel Souery

DOI: 10.1016/J.JAD.2011.02.014

关键词: Clinical psychologyNortriptylineDepression (differential diagnoses)Beck Depression InventoryPsychologyHamilton Rating Scale for DepressionEscitalopramMelancholic depressionPsychiatryAtypical depressionTricyclic antidepressant

摘要: Abstract Objective To investigate whether subtypes of depression predict differential outcomes treatment with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and a tricyclic antidepressant in major depression. Method Among 811 adults moderate-to-severe depression, melancholic, atypical, anxious anxious-somatizing established at baseline were evaluated as predictors outcome flexible dosage the SSRI escitalopram or nortriptyline. The primary measure was Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary measures 17-item Hamilton for (HRSD-17) Beck Inventory (BDI). Results Melancholic associated slightly worse among individuals treated escitalopram, but did not affect interaction between melancholic drug reach statistical significance significant results secondary robust sensitivity analyses. Atypical unrelated to either antidepressant. Anxious on measure, inconsistently predicted some Limitations Some participants non-randomly allocated drug. Therefore, drug-by-predictor interactions had be validated analyses restricted 468 randomly individuals. Conclusions Melancholic, atypical are sufficiently help clinician choose antidepressants. There is need other outcome.

参考文章(49)
John Kenneth Wing, Norman Sartorius, T Behirdan Üstün, None, Diagnosis and clinical measurement in psychiatry : a reference manual for SCAN ,(2008)
Jonathan W Stewart, Patrick J McGrath, Frederic M Quitkin, Donald F Klein, DSM-IV depression with atypical features: is it valid? Neuropsychopharmacology. ,vol. 34, pp. 2625- 2632 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NPP.2009.99
A John Rush, Jan E Weissenburger, Melancholic Symptom Features and DSM-IV American Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 151, pp. 489- 498 ,(1994) , 10.1176/AJP.151.4.489
Jonathan W. Stewart, Patrick J. McGrath, Judith G. Rabkin, Frederic M. Quitkin, Atypical depression. A valid clinical entity Psychiatric Clinics of North America. ,vol. 16, pp. 479- 495 ,(1993) , 10.1016/S0193-953X(18)30161-8
G. Parker, K. Fletcher, M. Hyett, D. Hadzi-Pavlovic, M. Barrett, H. Synnott, Measuring melancholia: the utility of a prototypic symptom approach. Psychological Medicine. ,vol. 39, pp. 989- 998 ,(2009) , 10.1017/S0033291708004339
Michael E Thase, Atypical Depression: Useful Concept, but it's Time to Revise the DSM-IV Criteria Neuropsychopharmacology. ,vol. 34, pp. 2633- 2641 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NPP.2009.100
Beny Lafer, Andrew A Nierenberg, Jerrold F Rosenbaum, Maurizio Fava, Outpatients with DSM-III-R versus DSM-IV melancholic depression Comprehensive Psychiatry. ,vol. 37, pp. 37- 39 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0010-440X(96)90048-6
Maurizio Fava, Lisa A. Uebelacker, Jonathan E. Alpert, Andrew A. Nierenberg, Joel A. Pava, Jerrold F. Rosenbaum, Major depressive subtypes and treatment response Biological Psychiatry. ,vol. 42, pp. 568- 576 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00440-4
James M Russell, Lorrin M Koran, John Rush, Robert MA Hirschfeld, Wilma Harrison, Edward S Friedman, Sonia Davis, Martin Keller, None, Effect of concurrent anxiety on response to sertraline and imipramine in patients with chronic depression. Depression and Anxiety. ,vol. 13, pp. 18- 27 ,(2001) , 10.1002/1520-6394(2001)13:1<18::AID-DA3>3.0.CO;2-M