The Tripartite Nature of Marital Commitment: Personal, Moral, and Structural Reasons to Stay Married

作者: Michael P. Johnson , John P. Caughlin , Ted L. Huston

DOI: 10.2307/353891

关键词: WifeCognitionPerceptionFeelingUnitary stateExperiential learningSocial psychologyAttractivenessPsychologyPhenomenonDevelopmental psychology

摘要: This study assesses the empirical viabilihy of Johnson's (1991) commitment framework. The core principle is that commitment, rather than a unitary phenomenon, involves three distinct experiences: wanting to stay married, feeling morally obligated and constrained married. Using data from sample married couples, we show direct measures experiences are not highly correlated with each other, measure so-called global function primarily, if exclusively; personal associated for most part components type as hypothesized in framework, types their same way other variables. Key Words: marriage, stability. What does it mean be committed relationship? Johnson (1973, 1982, 1991, press) has argued experience unitary, there different set causes, phenomenology, cognitive, emotional, behavioral consequences. Personal refers sense relationship, moral stay, structural regardless level or commitment. We report an investigation experiential nature context first marriages have survived 1981 1994. Data presented on relationships among relationship also functions related differently number antecedents TYPES OF COMMITMENT framework organized around discussion major identifies key sets factors contribute personal, moral, particular relationship. two experienced internal individual person's own attitudes values. third structural, external perceptions constraints make costly leave Commitment extent which one wants affected by (Johnson, 1991). First, individuals may want continue because they attracted partner. Second, attraction Although under many conditions these clearly phenomenon. One can feel strong who, behaves ways finds quite unsatisfactory. Furthermore, attractiveness joint actions both partners attributed primarily oneself. For example, physically abusive husband controls his wife convincing her abuse more fault 1995; Kirkwood, 1993; Pence & Paymar, 1993). In such case, woman negative feelings about violent but still love partner, who convinced he problem. component couple identity. Social central identity (Kuhn McPartland, 1954; McCall Simmons, 1978). …

参考文章(25)
Michael P. Johnson, Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women Journal of Marriage and Family. ,vol. 57, pp. 283- 294 ,(1995) , 10.2307/353683
Michael P. Johnson, Commitment: A Conceptual Structure and Empirical Application The Sociological Quarterly. ,vol. 14, pp. 395- 406 ,(1973) , 10.1111/J.1533-8525.1973.TB00868.X
Scott M. Stanley, Howard J. Markman, Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family. ,vol. 54, pp. 595- 608 ,(1992) , 10.2307/353245
Philip E. Converse, Angus Campbell, Willard L. Rodgers, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions ,(1976)
Thomas A. Wills, Robert L. Weiss, Gerald R. Patterson, A behavioral analysis of the determinants of marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. ,vol. 42, pp. 802- 811 ,(1974) , 10.1037/H0037524
Mary Lund, The Development of Investment and Commitment Scales for Predicting Continuity of Personal Relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. ,vol. 2, pp. 3- 23 ,(1985) , 10.1177/0265407585021001
Beverley Fehr, Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 55, pp. 557- 579 ,(1988) , 10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.557
Manford H. Kuhn, Thomas S. McPartland, An Empirical Investigation of Self-Attitudes American Sociological Review. ,vol. 19, pp. 68- 182 ,(1954) , 10.2307/2088175
Charles T. Hill, Gary Schwartz, Don Merten, Love and Commitment. Social Forces. ,vol. 10, pp. 1252- ,(1981) , 10.2307/2066561