RELATIONAL DYNAMICS AND PROCESSES OF RADICALIZATION: A COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK

作者: Eitan Alimi , Lorenzo Bosi , Chares Demetriou

DOI: 10.17813/MAIQ.17.1.U7RW348T8200174H

关键词: Contentious politicsCountermovementPower (social and political)RadicalizationPoliticsPolitical economySocial movementPolitical scienceIrishMovement (music)Social science

摘要: *† We propose an explanatory framework for the comparative study of radicalization that focuses on its “how” and “when” questions. build relational tradition in social movements contentious politics by expanding a mechanism-process research strategy. Attentive to similarities as well dissimilarities, our traces processes delineating four key arenas interaction— between movement political environment, among actors, activists state security forces, countermovement. Then, we analyze how similar corresponding general mechanisms—opportunity/threat spirals, competition power, outbidding, object shift—combine differently drive process. Last, identify set submechanisms each mechanism. The utility is demonstrated through analysis three ethnonational episodes radicalization: enosis-EOKA Cyprus (1950-1959), Provisional Irish Republican Army Northern Ireland (1969-1972), Fatah-Tanzim Palestine (1995-2001).

参考文章(40)
Jeroen Gunning, Social movement theory and the study of terrorism. Jackson, Richard & Breen Smyth, Marie & Gunning, Jeroen (Eds.). (2009). Critical terrorism studies : a new research agenda. London: Routledge, pp. 156-177. pp. 170- 191 ,(2009) , 10.4324/9780203880227-18
Niall Dochartaigh, Lorenzo Bosi, Territoriality and Mobilization: The Civil Rights Campaign in Northern Ireland Mobilization: An International Quarterly. ,vol. 15, pp. 405- 424 ,(2010) , 10.17813/MAIQ.15.4.W4712T07273N6518
William A. Gamson, David S. Meyer, Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Framing political opportunity Cambridge University Press. pp. 275- 290 ,(1996) , 10.1017/CBO9780511803987.014