A proposal for a novel rationale for critical effect size in dose-response analysis based on a multi-endpoint in vivo study with methyl methanesulfonate.

作者: Andreas Zeller , Leilei Tang , Stephen D. Dertinger , Juergen Funk , Gonzalo Duran-Pacheco

DOI: 10.1093/MUTAGE/GEV077

关键词: Methyl methanesulfonateFully developedReliability engineeringSample size determinationStandard deviationSurrogate endpointPharmacologyIn vivoBenchmark (computing)Computer scienceResponse analysis

摘要: Methyl methanesulfonate, a well-known direct-acting genotoxicant, was assessed in multi-endpoint study rats using six closely spaced dose levels. The main goal of the to investigate genotoxic response at very low doses and analyse this with dedicated statistical tools order find Point Departure (PoD) related metrics. Software packages like PROAST or EPA-BMDS require toxicologist define so-called critical effect size (CES) benchmark (BMR) choice has large impact on result PoD calculation. Currently, increases 5%, 10% 1 standard deviation over concurrent vehicle controls have been proposed for CES/BMR, values that may not be suited all genotoxicity endpoints. Based data obtained study, we propose an endpoint specific CES approach reflects typical evaluation process regulatory acceptable genotoxicology study. However, are aware ratio-based strategy will need more fully developed additional experimentation should mainly seen as starting point scientific discussion.

参考文章(66)
Lya G. Soeteman-Hernández, George E. Johnson, Wout Slob, Estimating the carcinogenic potency of chemicals from the in vivo micronucleus test Mutagenesis. ,vol. 31, pp. 347- 358 ,(2016) , 10.1093/MUTAGE/GEV043
Adam D. Thomas, Jörg Fahrer, George E. Johnson, Bernd Kaina, Theoretical considerations for thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis. Mutation Research-reviews in Mutation Research. ,vol. 765, pp. 56- 67 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.MRREV.2015.05.001
Bernd Kaina, Markus Christmann, Steffen Naumann, Wynand P. Roos, MGMT: key node in the battle against genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and apoptosis induced by alkylating agents. DNA Repair. ,vol. 6, pp. 1079- 1099 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.DNAREP.2007.03.008
Ismail Hassan Ismail, Michael J Hendzel, The γ‐H2A.X: Is it just a surrogate marker of double‐strand breaks or much more? Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. ,vol. 49, pp. 73- 82 ,(2008) , 10.1002/EM.20358
Elmar Gocke, Leilei Tang, Thomas Singer, Exposure to Ethylating Agents: Where Do the Thresholds for Mutagenic/Clastogenic Effects Arise? Genes and Environment. ,vol. 34, pp. 171- 178 ,(2012) , 10.3123/JEMSGE.34.171
Shareen H. Doak, Katja Brüsehafer, Ed Dudley, Emma Quick, George Johnson, Russell P. Newton, Gareth J.S. Jenkins, No-observed effect levels are associated with up-regulation of MGMT following MMS Exposure Mutation Research. ,vol. 648, pp. 9- 14 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.MRFMMM.2008.09.016