Safety in long term radioactive waste management: Insight and oversight

作者: Jantine Schröder , Nicolas Rossignol , Michiel Van Oudheusden

DOI: 10.1016/J.SSCI.2016.02.003

关键词: Radioactive wasteSociotechnical systemPoison controlActive safetyHazardous wasteRisk analysis (engineering)Term (time)Transport engineeringAmbiguityOccupational safety and healthEngineering

摘要: Abstract High-level, long-lived radioactive waste remains hazardous for periods that go well beyond our human conception of time (many thousands years). Because active safety measures are considered unreliable, unjustifiable and simply impossible over such long spans, experts worldwide recommend geological disposal as the preferred strategy long-term management, to a large extent due its promise delivering ‘passive safety’. Passive refers repository being safe ‘by itself’, i.e. unmediated by actors actions. Safety is thus approached technically delineated an intrinsic property system. As such, notion safety’ entails system simplification allows approaching in more calculable predictable manner than would be case ‘active In this article, we describe analyze ambiguity seemingly straightforward approach safety. Drawing on constructivist insights from science technology studies, propose integrated sociotechnical vision transcends versus passive division. The ‘oversight’, it currently starting surface international management discourses, will used sensitizing concept, offering potential elaborate vision.

参考文章(20)
M. Sasaki, C. H. Clement, W. Weiss, Radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste Published for the International Commission on Radiological Protection by Elsevier. ,(2013)
Jantine Schröder, Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: A Long-Term Socio-Technical Experiment Science and Engineering Ethics. ,vol. 22, pp. 687- 705 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S11948-015-9650-4
Michiel Van Oudheusden, Brice Laurent, Shifting and Deepening Engagements: Experimental Normativity in Public Participation in Science and Technology Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. ,vol. 9, pp. 3- 22 ,(2013)
Erik Hollnagel, Is safety a subject for science Safety Science. ,vol. 67, pp. 21- 24 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.SSCI.2013.07.025
A. M. Weinberg, Social Institutions and Nuclear Energy Science. ,vol. 177, pp. 27- 34 ,(1972) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.177.4043.27
G.F. Bennett, The principles of radioactive waste management Journal of Hazardous Materials. ,vol. 54, pp. 129- ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0304-3894(97)89411-3
Snorre Sklet, Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries. ,vol. 19, pp. 494- 506 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JLP.2005.12.004
Constance Perin, Operating as Experimenting: Synthesizing Engineering and Scientific Values in Nuclear Power Production Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 23, pp. 98- 128 ,(1998) , 10.1177/016224399802300105
Nicolas Rossignol, Catrinel Turcanu, Catherine Fallon, Catherine Zwetkoff, “How are you vulnerable?”: Using participation for vulnerability analysis in emergency planning Journal of Risk Research. ,vol. 20, pp. 1095- 1114 ,(2017) , 10.1080/13669877.2014.961522