A comparison of estimated achivement scores obtained from student achievement assessment test utilizing classical test theory, unidimensional and multidimensional IRT Öğrenci başarılarının belirlenmesi sınavından klasik test kuramı, tek ve çok boyutlu madde tepki kuramı modelleri ile kestirilen başarı puanlarının karşılaştırılması

作者: Yeşim Özer Özkan

DOI: 10.14687/IJHS.V11I1.2739

关键词: Classical test theoryStatisticsPsychologyItem response theoryTest batteryStudent achievementTest (assessment)

摘要: The focus of this research is to test the estimation achievement measurements in battery and empirically compare results after applying classical theory, unidimensional multidimensional item response theory models Student Achievement Assessment Test (OBBS-2008) subtests Turkish Mathematics. It also tries put forward best model that estimates students’ with less error as comparison being made. From analysis test's data results, it identified ability parameters estimated obtained from whole under IRT, have partially scores reached more precise measurement than unidimensional  IRT on basis sub dimensions CTT.  Similar were mathematics results. Finally, found parameters, within scope scores. Ozet Bu arastirmada, bir bataryasindaki basari olculeri kestiriminin dogrulugunun belirlenmesi ve ampirik olarak Klasik Kurami (KTK), tek cok boyutlu Madde Tepki (MTK) modellerinin Ogrenci Basarilarinin Belirlenmesi Sinavi’nin Turkce matematik alt testi verilerine uygulanarak elde edilen olculerinin karsilastirilmasi amaclanmistir. karsilastirmalar yapilirken olculerini daha az hata ile kestiren en iyi ortaya konulmaya calisilmistir. verilerinin analizi sonucunda tum testten MTK kestirilen yetenek parametrelerinin boyutlar bazinda MTK’ye gore parametreleri KTK’ye puanlarina kiyasla kismen dusuk standart hataya sahip oldugu belirlenmistir. Matematik sonucunda, kestiriminde hatanin gore; yuksek ise testinin boyutlarindan belirlenen puanlardan edildigi

参考文章(31)
W. Todd Rogers, Joanna Tomkowicz, The Use of One-, Two-, and Three-Parameter and Nominal Item Response Scoring in Place of Number-Right Scoring in the Presence of Test-Wiseness Alberta Journal of Educational Research. ,vol. 51, pp. 200- 215 ,(2005)
Terry A. Ackerman, Tim C. Davey, Concurrent Adaptive Measurement of Multiple Abilities. ,(1991)
Steven P. Reise, Susan E. Embretson, Item response theory for psychologists ,(2000)
Shelby J. Haberman, Sandip Sinharay, Reporting of Subscores Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory Psychometrika. ,vol. 75, pp. 209- 227 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11336-010-9158-4
David A. Harrison, Robustness of IRT parameter estimation to violations of the unidimensionality assumption. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. ,vol. 11, pp. 91- 115 ,(1986) , 10.3102/10769986011002091
Raymond J. Adams, Mark Wilson, Wen-chung Wang, The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model Applied Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 21, pp. 1- 23 ,(1997) , 10.1177/0146621697211001
Fritz Drasgow, Charles K. Parsons, Application of Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models to Multidimensional Data Applied Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 7, pp. 189- 199 ,(1983) , 10.1177/014662168300700207
R. Darrell Bock, David Thissen, Michele F. Zimowski, IRT Estimation of Domain Scores Journal of Educational Measurement. ,vol. 34, pp. 197- 211 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1745-3984.1997.TB00515.X