The Differential Outcomes Effect Using Sensory Outcomes in a Many-to-One Matching-to-Sample Task

作者: Laura Rebeca Mateos Morfín , Carlos Flores , J. Bruce Overmier

DOI: 10.1590/0102.3772E3427

关键词: Differential outcomes effectMany to oneCognitive psychologySensory systemTask (project management)Matching to samplePsychology

摘要:

参考文章(34)
Erik Arntzen, Per Holth, PROBABILITY OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE AS A FUNCTION OF CLASS SIZE VS. NUMBER OF CLASSES Psychological Record. ,vol. 50, pp. 79- 104 ,(2000) , 10.1007/BF03395344
Karen Chambers, Odette T. Miller, Kevin M. Waugh, Differential Outcomes Effect: Increased Accuracy in Adults Learning Kanji with Stimulus Specific Rewards Psychological Record. ,vol. 52, pp. 315- 324 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF03395433
Celso Goyos, Equivalence Class Formation Via Common Reinforcers Among Preschool Children Psychological Record. ,vol. 50, pp. 629- 654 ,(2000) , 10.1007/BF03395375
Erik Arntzen, Per Holth, Equivalence Outcome in Single Subjects as a Function of Training Structure Psychological Record. ,vol. 50, pp. 603- 628 ,(2000) , 10.1007/BF03395374
Cammarie Johnson, Olga Meleshkevich, William V. Dube, Merging separately established stimulus classes with outcome-specific reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 101, pp. 38- 50 ,(2014) , 10.1002/JEAB.61
Leh Woon Mok, Angeles F. Estevez, J. Bruce Overmier, UniqUe OUtcOme expectatiOns as a training and pedagOgical tOOl Psychological Record. ,vol. 60, pp. 227- 247 ,(2010) , 10.1007/BF03395705
Alexander Easton, Simon Child, Ginesa Lopez-Crespo, Differential outcomes aid the formation of categorical relationships between stimuli Behavioural Brain Research. ,vol. 222, pp. 270- 273 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BBR.2011.03.036
Murray Sidman, Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 74, pp. 127- 146 ,(2000) , 10.1901/JEAB.2000.74-127
Peter J. Urcuioli, Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning Animal Learning & Behavior. ,vol. 33, pp. 1- 21 ,(2005) , 10.3758/BF03196047