Autorefraction, Retinoscopy, Javal’s Rule, and Grosvenor’s Modified Javal’s Rule: The Best Predictor of Refractive Astigmatism

作者: Kofi Asiedu , Samuel Kyei , Emmanuel Ekow Ampiah

DOI: 10.1155/2016/3584137

关键词: RetinoscopyIntraclass correlationOptometryAstigmatismArtificial intelligenceSubjective refractionLimits of agreementMedicineSpherical equivalentComputer vision

摘要: The aim of the study was to determine level agreement between Javal’s rule, autorefraction, retinoscopy, and refractive astigmatism which technique is most suitable substitute when subjective refraction not applicable using a clinical sample. A total 36 subjects, 14 males 22 females, were involved in this study. intraclass correlation coefficients refraction, retinoscopy 0.895 0.989, respectively, for spherical equivalent. Bland-Altman 95% limits autorefraction; retinoscopy; autorefraction −2.84 3.58, −0.88 1.12, −3.01 3.53, spectacle following techniques as follows: (0.85); (0.92); rule (0.82); Grosvenor et al. version (0.85). rule; −0.87 1.25, −1.49 1.99, −0.73 1.93, −0.89 1.7, astigmatism. showed that may provide starting point cylinder power determination but only satisfactorily replace applicable.

参考文章(24)
Mingguang He, Nathan Congdon, Graeme MacKenzie, Yangfa Zeng, Joshua D. Silver, Leon Ellwein, The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou Ophthalmology. ,vol. 118, pp. 1162- 1169 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2010.10.003
António Queirós, Manuel A Parafita, Jorge Jorge, José B Almeida, Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction? Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 82, pp. 64- 68 ,(2005)
THEODORE GROSVENOR, SAM QUINTERO, DAVID M. PERRIGIN, Predicting refractive astigmatism: a suggested simplification of Javal's rule. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 65, pp. 292- 297 ,(1988) , 10.1097/00006324-198804000-00009
Amy L. Sheppard, Leon N. Davies, Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. ,vol. 30, pp. 143- 151 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1475-1313.2009.00701.X
Yee-Fong Choong, Ai-Hong Chen, Pik-Pin Goh, A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children American Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 142, pp. 68- 74 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AJO.2006.01.084
Leon Nicholas Davies, Edward Arthur Harry Mallen, James Stuart Wolffsohn, Bernard Gilmartin, None, Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 80, pp. 320- 324 ,(2003) , 10.1097/00006324-200304000-00011
Sherwin J Isenberg, Madeline Del Signore, Geula Madani-Becker, Use of the HARK autorefractor in children American Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 131, pp. 438- 441 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00861-8
GREGG STEELE, DENNIS IRELAND, and SANDRA BLOCK, Cycloplegic autorefraction results in pre-school children using the Nikon Retinomax Plus and the Welch Allyn SureSight. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 80, pp. 573- 577 ,(2003) , 10.1097/00006324-200308000-00010
Richard A Armstrong, Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. ,vol. 33, pp. 7- 14 ,(2013) , 10.1111/OPO.12009
MICHAEL W. ROUSE, ERIC BORSTING, PAUL N. DELAND, Reliability of binocular vision measurements used in the classification of convergence insufficiency. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 79, pp. 254- 264 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00006324-200204000-00012