作者: Kofi Asiedu , Samuel Kyei , Emmanuel Ekow Ampiah
DOI: 10.1155/2016/3584137
关键词: Retinoscopy 、 Intraclass correlation 、 Optometry 、 Astigmatism 、 Artificial intelligence 、 Subjective refraction 、 Limits of agreement 、 Medicine 、 Spherical equivalent 、 Computer vision
摘要: The aim of the study was to determine level agreement between Javal’s rule, autorefraction, retinoscopy, and refractive astigmatism which technique is most suitable substitute when subjective refraction not applicable using a clinical sample. A total 36 subjects, 14 males 22 females, were involved in this study. intraclass correlation coefficients refraction, retinoscopy 0.895 0.989, respectively, for spherical equivalent. Bland-Altman 95% limits autorefraction; retinoscopy; autorefraction −2.84 3.58, −0.88 1.12, −3.01 3.53, spectacle following techniques as follows: (0.85); (0.92); rule (0.82); Grosvenor et al. version (0.85). rule; −0.87 1.25, −1.49 1.99, −0.73 1.93, −0.89 1.7, astigmatism. showed that may provide starting point cylinder power determination but only satisfactorily replace applicable.