Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests

作者: M. Linkie , M. S. Ridout

DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-7998.2011.00801.X

关键词: MuntjacCamera trapSumatran tigerPantheraEcologyPredationOverlap coefficientBiologyTigerOptimal foraging theory

摘要: Little is known about interactions between the critically endangered Sumatran tiger Panthera tigris sumatrae and its prey because of difficulties associated with detecting these species. In this study, we quantify temporal overlap five presumed species from four study areas comprising disturbed lowland to primary submontane forest. Data 126 camera traps over 8984 days were used estimate activity patterns and, in turn, their through coefficient Δ (ranging 0 1, i.e. no complete overlap). A newly developed statistical technique was applied determine confidence intervals respective overlap, which important, as such measures precision are usually not estimated types study. Strong found muntjac Muntiacus (Δ=0.80, 95%CI=0.71–0.84) sambar Cervus unicolor (Δ=0.81, 0.55–0.85), latter illustrating importance measuring precision. According foraging theory, tigers should focus on expending lower levels energy searching for then capturing larger bodied that present least risk. Hence, surprisingly, there little crepuscular largest-bodied available, nocturnal tapir Tapirus indicus (0.52, 0.44–0.60), suggesting it a principal This provides first insights into tiger–prey interactions. The ability statistics has obvious wide benefits other predator–prey interspecific competition studies.

参考文章(21)
MATTHEW LINKIE, GUILLAUME CHAPRON, DEBORAH J. MARTYR, JEREMY HOLDEN, NIGEL LEADER-WILLIAMS, Assessing the viability of tiger subpopulations in a fragmented landscape Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 43, pp. 576- 586 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2006.01153.X
J. J. Fernández-Durán, Circular distributions based on nonnegative trigonometric sums. Biometrics. ,vol. 60, pp. 499- 503 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0006-341X.2004.00195.X
J. S. Brown, J. W. Laundre, M. Gurung, The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 80, pp. 385- 399 ,(1999) , 10.2307/1383287
S. Creel, D. Christianson, S. Liley, J. A. Winnie, Predation Risk Affects Reproductive Physiology and Demography of Elk Science. ,vol. 315, pp. 960- 960 ,(2007) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1135918
Margaret F. Kinnaird, Eric W. Sanderson, Timothy G. O'Brien, Hariyo T. Wibisono, Gillian Woolmer, Deforestation Trends in a Tropical Landscape and Implications for Endangered Large Mammals Conservation Biology. ,vol. 17, pp. 245- 257 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.2003.02040.X
Chris Carbone, Amber Teacher, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, The costs of carnivory PLOS Biology. ,vol. 5, ,(2007) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.0050022
Charles C. Taylor, Automatic bandwidth selection for circular density estimation Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. ,vol. 52, pp. 3493- 3500 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.CSDA.2007.11.003
K. Ullas Karanth, Melvin E. Sunquist, prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 64, pp. 439- 450 ,(1995) , 10.2307/5647
Matthew Linkie, Iding Achmad Haidir, Agung Nugroho, Yoan Dinata, Conserving tigers Panthera tigris in selectively logged Sumatran forests Biological Conservation. ,vol. 141, pp. 2410- 2415 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2008.07.002
A. P. Andheria, K. U. Karanth, N. S. Kumar, Diet and prey profiles of three sympatric large carnivores in Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 273, pp. 169- 175 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1469-7998.2007.00310.X