Predictors of anxiety and depression among people attending diabetes screening: A prospective cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomized control trial

作者: C. A. M. Paddison , H. C. Eborall , D. P. French , A. L. Kinmonth , A. T. Prevost

DOI: 10.1348/135910710X495366

关键词: Mass screeningClinical psychologyPsychiatryCohort studyRandomized controlled trialHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleProspective cohort studyAnxietyDepression (differential diagnoses)MedicineComorbidity

摘要: Objective. This study aimed to identify factors predicting anxiety and depression among people who attend primary care-based diabetes screening. Design. A prospective cohort embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomized control trial. Methods. Participants (N= 3,240) at risk of were identified from 10 care practices invited a stepwise screening programme as part trial. Main outcome measures 12 months post-screening assessed using Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). Results. Hierarchical linear regressions showed that demographic, clinical, psychological variables collectively accounted for 52% variance HADS scores 53% after screening. Screening (positive or negative diabetes) was not related differences months. Higher number self-reported (diabetes) symptoms first attendance associated with higher 12-month follow-up, controlling attendance. Conclusion. Participants low on scales appointment 1 year later. Diagnosis shown have limited impact may be less important than symptom perception determining emotional outcomes participation

参考文章(39)
A. S. Zigmond, R. P. Snaith, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. ,(1983)
Adriaanse M. C., Snoek F. J., Dekker J. M., Van Der Ploeg H. M., Heine R. J., Screening for Type 2 diabetes: an exploration of subjects’ perceptions regarding diagnosis and procedure Diabetic Medicine. ,vol. 19, pp. 406- 411 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1464-5491.2002.00710.X
David P. French, Esther Maissi, Theresa M. Marteau, The psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results: three-month follow-up. Psycho-oncology. ,vol. 15, pp. 498- 508 ,(2006) , 10.1002/PON.980
Francisco Esteves, Arne Öhman, Anders Flykt, Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. ,vol. 130, pp. 466- 478 ,(2001) , 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.466
D P French, E Maissi, T M Marteau, Psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 91, pp. 1887- 1892 ,(2004) , 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6602224
Bart Thoolen, Denise De Ridder, Jozien Bensing, Kees Gorter, Guy Rutten, No worries, no impact? A systematic review of emotional, cognitive, and behavioural responses to the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes Health Psychology Review. ,vol. 2, pp. 65- 93 ,(2008) , 10.1080/17437190802311361
Lori J. Lange, John D. Piette, Personal Models for Diabetes in Context and Patients’ Health Status Journal of Behavioral Medicine. ,vol. 29, pp. 239- 253 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S10865-006-9049-4
Howard Leventhal, Michael Diefenbach, Elaine A. Leventhal, Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions Cognitive Therapy and Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 143- 163 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF01173486
Steven E. Finkel, Causal Analysis with Panel Data ,(1995)