Researcher–Practitioner Partnering in Industry-Funded Participatory Action Research

作者: Karin Breu , Christopher Hemingway

DOI: 10.1007/S11213-005-8482-6

关键词: Political scienceCredibilitySpillover effectParticipatory action researchPublic relationsPower (social and political)Discretion

摘要: This paper reflects on our experiences with researcher–practitioner partnering within an industry-funded Participatory Action Research (PAR) project. We find that the nature of in engagement differs from traditional, non-industry funded PAR research. The distribution power academic-practitioner research team, whilst fairly equitable at outset project, shifted favour practitioner partners progressive spillover credibility and knowledge academic to during course engagement. Adhering recommendations for teams, experience, does not guarantee successful according due problem. As partners' base erodes, discretion preserve integrity method is increasingly placed hands partners.

参考文章(27)
Etienne Wenger, Jeanne Lave, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation ,(1991)
John Heron, A Participatory Inquiry Paradigm Qualitative Inquiry. ,vol. 3, pp. 274- 294 ,(1997) , 10.1177/107780049700300302
Jeanne Liedtka, Linking Competitive Advantage with Communities of Practice Journal of Management Inquiry. ,vol. 8, pp. 5- 16 ,(1999) , 10.1177/105649269981002
John Seely Brown, Allan Collins, Paul Duguid, Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning Educational Researcher. ,vol. 18, pp. 32- 42 ,(1989) , 10.3102/0013189X018001032
Rajesh Tandon, Social Transformation and Participatory Research. Convergence: An International Journal of Adult Education. ,vol. 21, pp. 5- 18 ,(1988)
David Stamps, Communities of Practice: Learning Is Social. Training Is Irrelevant? Knowledge and Communities. ,vol. 34, pp. 53- 64 ,(2000) , 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7293-1.50007-X
Bob Filipczak, Are You Wired Enough Training. ,vol. 34, pp. 34- 39 ,(1997)