Influence of x-ray diffraction sample preparation on quantitative mineralogy: implications for chromate waste treatment.

作者: Dimitris Dermatas , Maria Chrysochoou , Sarra Pardali , Dennis G. Grubb

DOI: 10.2134/JEQ2006.0215

关键词: ChromiteWaste treatmentParticle sizeChromate conversion coatingPowder diffractionMineral processingMetallurgyCyclohexaneChemistrySample preparation

摘要: Powders of chromite ore processing residue (COPR) were mineralogically evaluated using quantitative X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) to illustrate the impacts sample preparation procedures. Chromite is strongly alkaline, reactive, contains minerals varying hardness and absorption coefficients, exhibits significant amorphicity. This poses a challenge produce powders for XRPD analysis that are sufficiently fine uniform particle size while avoiding mineral reactions overgrinding effects. Dry, hand pulverization different grain sizes, wet, mechanical (micromilling) four milling liquids (cyclohexane, isopropanol, ethanol, water), variable durations (up 15 min) evaluated. Micromilling with light, nonpolar, highly evaporative liquid such as cyclohexane time 5 min mitigated systematic errors microabsorption preferred orientation it produced finer more distributions than hand-pulverized powders, simultaneously affording least preparation. Conversely, use water resulted in extensive hydration during preparation, causing mischaracterization underestimation its reactive brownmillerite content, which can complicate remediation design process COPR. Hand emerged necessary complement quantify Cr(VI)-containing, softer destroyed milling, quantification has also important implications COPR treatment design. The findings this study may be applicable variety geochemically complicated environmental media (metal-contaminated soils, stabilized/solidified media, inorganic waste), points importance method obtain reliable results.

参考文章(25)
P. S. Whitfield, L. D. Mitchell, Quantitative Rietveld analysis of the amorphous content in cements and clinkers Journal of Materials Science. ,vol. 38, pp. 4415- 4421 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1026363906432
David L. Bish, Jeffrey Edward Post, Modern powder diffraction Mineralogical Society of America. ,(1989)
R. A. Young, The Rietveld method Crystal Research and Technology. ,vol. 30, ,(1993)
D. H. Phillips, B. Gu, D. B. Watson, Y. Roh, Impact of sample preparation on mineralogical analysis of zero-valent iron reactive barrier materials Journal of Environmental Quality. ,vol. 32, pp. 1299- 1305 ,(2003) , 10.2134/JEQ2003.1299
Frank Philip Bowden, David Tabor, The friction and lubrication of solids ,(1954)
H. M. Rietveld, A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures Journal of Applied Crystallography. ,vol. 2, pp. 65- 71 ,(1969) , 10.1107/S0021889869006558
Dimitris Dermatas, Maria Chrysochoou, Deok Hyun Moon, Dennis G. Grubb, Mahmoud Wazne, Christos Christodoulatos, Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 40, pp. 5786- 5792 ,(2006) , 10.1021/ES0604461