Parental attitudes to myopia: a key agent of change for myopia control?

作者: Saoirse McCrann , Ian Flitcroft , Kevin Lalor , John Butler , Aaron Bush

DOI: 10.1111/OPO.12455

关键词: Control (management)Screen timeActivities of daily livingEyestrainHealth riskPublic healthRisk profileDemographyRural backgroundMedicine

摘要: PURPOSE With the increasing prevalence in myopia there is growing interest active prevention. This study aims to increase our understanding of parental attitudes development and control, as a means inform future health planning policy. It evaluates, for first time, attitude parents its associated risks, well assessing exposure Irish children environmental factors that may influence their risk profile development. METHODS Parents 8-13 year old eight participating schools completed questionnaire designed assess knowledge towards factors. A structured diary was also used capture daily activities relation RESULTS Of 329 parents, just 46% considered presented children, while an identical number (46%) regarded it optical inconvenience. Myopia also, but less frequently, expense (31% parents), cosmetic inconvenience (14% parents) and, by some, sign intelligence (4% 76% recognised potential digital technology impact eye, particularly cause eyestrain need spectacles. Only 14% expressed concern should child be diagnosed with myopia. Compared non myopic viewed more (p < 0.001), (p < 0.005) (p < 0.001). There trend limit screen time use household than non-myopic (p = 0.05). who sought did not regard (p = 0.01). Children spent significantly longer performing indoor proximal tasks (255 min) compared outdoors (180 min; p < 0.0001) daily. Older (p = 0.001), urban (p = 0.0005) (=0.04) at screens younger from rural background. CONCLUSION Parental were typically nonchalant risk. particular given have on children's behaviour choices respect such factors, demonstrating acute societal sensitisation public importance

参考文章(61)
Yin-Yang Lee, Chung-Ting Lo, Shwu-Jiuan Sheu, Julia L. Lin, What factors are associated with myopia in young adults? A survey study in Taiwan Military Conscripts. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 54, pp. 1026- 1033 ,(2013) , 10.1167/IOVS.12-10480
Caroline C. W. Klaver, Age-Specific Prevalence and Causes of Blindness and Visual Impairment in an Older Population Archives of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 116, pp. 653- 658 ,(1998) , 10.1001/ARCHOPHT.116.5.653
JAMES F. SALLIS, Age-related decline in physical activity: a synthesis of human and animal studies. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. ,vol. 32, pp. 1598- 1600 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00012
NICOLA S. LOGAN, LEON N. DAVIES, EDWARD A. H. MALLEN, BERNARD GILMARTIN, Ametropia and ocular biometry in a U.K. university student population. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 82, pp. 261- 266 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.OPX.0000159358.71125.95
Francis A. Young, George A. Leary, William R. Baldwin, Donald C. West, Roy A. Box, Eugene Harris, Curtis Johnson, The transmission of refractive errors within eskimo families. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 46, pp. 676- 685 ,(1969) , 10.1097/00006324-196909000-00005
Lisa M Klesges, Tom Baranowski, Bettina Beech, Karen Cullen, David M Murray, Jim Rochon, Charlotte Pratt, Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS) Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 38, pp. 78- 87 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.YPMED.2003.07.003
C Cedrone, C Nucci, G Scuderi, F Ricci, A Cerulli, F Culasso, Prevalence of blindness and low vision in an Italian population: a comparison with other European studies. Eye. ,vol. 20, pp. 661- 667 ,(2006) , 10.1038/SJ.EYE.6701934
P J Foster, Y Jiang, Epidemiology of myopia Eye. ,vol. 28, pp. 202- 208 ,(2014) , 10.1038/EYE.2013.280
Prema Ganesan, Christine F Wildsoet, Pharmaceutical intervention for myopia control Expert Review of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 5, pp. 759- 787 ,(2010) , 10.1586/EOP.10.67