Empathy Training: Methods, Evaluation Practices, and Validity

作者: Flanny C. Alamparambil , Tony Chiu Ming Lam , Klodiana Kolomitro

DOI:

关键词: Human servicesCognitionEmpathyResearch designConceptualizationExperiential learningSocial psychologyFeelingConstruct validityPsychology

摘要: Background: Empathy is an individual’s capacity to understand the behavior of others, experience their feelings, and express that understanding them. Empathic ability asset professionally for individuals, such as teachers, physicians social workers, who work with people.  Being empathetic also critical our being able live others in general, ultimately leading happier lives. Subsequently it seems imperative examine if how possible enhance people’s empathic ability. Purpose: The purpose this article use narrative review method analyze studies empathy training human service science disciplines over past thirty years address questions: “How have people been trained what are findings?” was evaluated valid these evaluation Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Research Design: Data Collection Analysis: Narrative review. Findings: Twenty-nine articles pertaining research were identified based on advanced computer search following databases: “Education Full Text,” “ProQuest Education Journals,” “Web Knowledge” “Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC). Seven types methods noted 29 evaluations most popular didactic related (42%). All but two (93%) reported positive findings, mainly regard learning (86%), or cognitive component empathy. These findings suggest regardless method, individuals can learn about concept Unfortunately, information effects individuals’ feeling propensity take perspective demonstrate natural environments lacking. Consequently, very little known trainability affective behavioral components Also, some moderated by gender, age, education level, time measurement. Regarding designs, used self-reporting collect trainees’ knowledge quantitative a control group pretesting impact. Construct validity both measurement problematic. A majority did not clearly define empathy, provide defined, and/or measure trained; conceptualization across consistent either.  In sum, data from reviewed neither complete nor enough clear full More apparently needed hopefully lessons learned will be considered designing future studies. Keywords: training; evaluation;

参考文章(45)
Robert R. Carkhuff, Helping and human relations ,(1969)
Charles S. Reichardt, Marian A. Solomon, William R. Shadish, Howard E. Freeman, Evaluation studies : review annual Sage Publications. ,(1976)
John E. LeCapitaine, David M. McConnell, The Effects of Group Creativity Training on Teachers' Empathy and Interactions with Students. Reading Improvement. ,vol. 25, ,(1985)
Sherry L Hatcher, Jerome T Galea, Missi S Nadeau, Kaye Marz, Lisa K Walsh, Meredith Reynolds, The Teaching of Empathy for High School and College Students: Testing Rogerian Methods with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index Adolescence. ,vol. 29, pp. 961- 974 ,(1994)
William R. Shadish, Donald Thomas Campbell, Thomas D. Cook, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference ,(2001)
Michael D. Beck, Review and Other Views: “Alignment” as a Psychometric Issue Applied Measurement in Education. ,vol. 20, pp. 127- 135 ,(2007) , 10.1080/08957340709336733
William T. Crabb, John C. Moracco, Robert C. Bender, A Comparative Study of Empathy Training with Programmed Instruction for Lay Helpers. Journal of Counseling Psychology. ,vol. 30, pp. 221- 226 ,(1983) , 10.1037/0022-0167.30.2.221
Jeffery A. Giordano, Donna Billingsley, Susan Gantt, Paraprofessional Skill: Maintenance of Empathic Sensitivity after Training. Journal of Counseling Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 374- 379 ,(1980) , 10.1037//0022-0167.27.4.374