作者: Maria Mercedes Reverte-Vinaixa , Joan Minguell , Nayana Joshi , Eugenio Wenceslao Díaz-Ferreiro , Gemma Duarri
DOI: 10.1177/230949901402200116
关键词: Patient satisfaction 、 Surgery 、 Knee Joint 、 Visual analogue scale 、 Anterior cruciate ligament 、 Tendon 、 Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction 、 Hamstring 、 Hamstring tendon 、 Medicine
摘要: PURPOSE. To report outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using tibial or hamstring tendon allografts and to compare with another study non-irradiated fresh-frozen bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. METHODS. Records 12 men 7 women aged 18 53 (mean, 33) years who underwent ACL reconstructions (n=17) (n=2) were retrospectively reviewed. At the time primary reconstruction, autografts (n=8) bonepatellar (n=11) used. The mean interval between surgeries was 93 (range, 11-225) months. causes failure traumatic injury (n=7) technical biological reasons (n=12). physical activity level high in 2 patients, medium 10, low 7. For clinical assessment, Lysholm test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scale, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain Patient satisfaction also assessed. RESULTS. Four patients had laxity dissatisfied very outcome; rate 21%. IKDC score 63% 25-100%), 74% 30-100%). Comparing our those bone-patellar-bone allografts, there no significant difference terms VAS pain, score, score. without chondral and/or meniscal lesions, only (86±11 vs. 57±28, p=0.043). used at autografts, (4.4±3.1 1.6±1.0, p=0.020). CONCLUSION. Revision provided acceptable results, similar