Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibial or hamstring tendon allografts.

作者: Maria Mercedes Reverte-Vinaixa , Joan Minguell , Nayana Joshi , Eugenio Wenceslao Díaz-Ferreiro , Gemma Duarri

DOI: 10.1177/230949901402200116

关键词: Patient satisfactionSurgeryKnee JointVisual analogue scaleAnterior cruciate ligamentTendonAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionHamstringHamstring tendonMedicine

摘要: PURPOSE. To report outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using tibial or hamstring tendon allografts and to compare with another study non-irradiated fresh-frozen bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. METHODS. Records 12 men 7 women aged 18 53 (mean, 33) years who underwent ACL reconstructions (n=17) (n=2) were retrospectively reviewed. At the time primary reconstruction, autografts (n=8) bonepatellar (n=11) used. The mean interval between surgeries was 93 (range, 11-225) months. causes failure traumatic injury (n=7) technical biological reasons (n=12). physical activity level high in 2 patients, medium 10, low 7. For clinical assessment, Lysholm test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scale, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain Patient satisfaction also assessed. RESULTS. Four patients had laxity dissatisfied very outcome; rate 21%. IKDC score 63% 25-100%), 74% 30-100%). Comparing our those bone-patellar-bone allografts, there no significant difference terms VAS pain, score, score. without chondral and/or meniscal lesions, only (86±11 vs. 57±28, p=0.043). used at autografts, (4.4±3.1 1.6±1.0, p=0.020). CONCLUSION. Revision provided acceptable results, similar

参考文章(21)
F R Noyes, S D Barber-Westin, C S Roberts, Use of Allografts after Failed Treatment of Rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 76, pp. 1019- 1031 ,(1994) , 10.2106/00004623-199407000-00010
Andreas P. Diamantopoulos, Olaf Lorbach, Hans H. Paessler, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction Results in 107 Patients American Journal of Sports Medicine. ,vol. 36, pp. 851- 860 ,(2008) , 10.1177/0363546507312381
Mark G. Grossman, Neal S. ElAttrache, Clarence L. Shields, Ronald E. Glousman, Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: three- to nine-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. ,vol. 21, pp. 418- 423 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.ARTHRO.2004.12.009
Charles A. Bush-Joseph, John Bojchuk, Bernard R. Bach, Jeff A. Fox, Jennifer Hayden, Mark Pierce, Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft. Arthroscopy. ,vol. 20, pp. 787- 794 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ARTHRO.2004.07.019
Darren L. Johnson, Todd M. Swenson, James J. Irrgang, Freddie H. Fu, Christopher D. Harner, Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Pittsburgh. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 325, pp. 100- 109 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00003086-199604000-00011
Gemma Vilagut, José María Valderas, Montserrat Ferrer, Olatz Garin, Esther López-García, Jordi Alonso, Interpretación de los cuestionarios de salud SF-36 y SF-12 en España: componentes físico y mental Medicina Clinica. ,vol. 130, pp. 726- 735 ,(2008) , 10.1157/13121076
Andreas Weiler, Arno Schmeling, Ivonne Stöhr, Max J. Kääb, Michael Wagner, Primary versus Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Prospective Matched-Group Analysis American Journal of Sports Medicine. ,vol. 35, pp. 1643- 1652 ,(2007) , 10.1177/0363546507303114
Lucy J. Salmon, Leo A. Pinczewski, Vivianne J. Russell, Kathryn Refshauge, Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft: 5- to 9-Year Follow-up American Journal of Sports Medicine. ,vol. 34, pp. 1604- 1614 ,(2006) , 10.1177/0363546506288015