Meeting multiple policy objectives under GHG emissions reduction targets

作者: David Blandford , Richard N. Boisvert

DOI:

关键词: Environmental planningEconomicsNatural resource economicsProductivityGreenhouse gasFood securityRedistribution of income and wealthEnvironmental qualityGross domestic productAgricultural productivityAgriculture

摘要: Although agriculture accounts for less than 1% of Norway’s gross domestic product it is estimated to account roughly 8% GHG emissions. Norwegian also one the most heavily protected in world. The OECD’s producer support estimate (PSE) Norway 60% 2010 was highest among member countries Organization (OECD, 2011). Like many other countries, pursues a range objectives its agricultural sector. traditional emphasis has been on productivity, food security and providing income employment. More recently, landscape preservation improving environmental quality have become increasingly important (Lyssandtrae, 2006). If there need reduce emissions from agriculture, this may be balanced against objectives. Future policies sector will address multiple sometimes conflicting outcomes. In paper we examine problem through theoretical model an that supplies positive attribute (landscape amenity) as well two negative attributes (GHG nutrient contamination ground surface water). can engage production activities contribute reductions concentration carbon atmosphere (carbon sequestration activities). our involves devoting land growing trees (agro-forestry). We use policy choices designed increase contribution while at same time reducing contribution. implications achieving imposition internationally determined emission reduction requirement agriculture. Our focus solely achievement do not include any objectives, such redistribution consumers farmers. final section some complications results programme design implementation. While encompasses essential features Norway, believe analytical results, implementation more general applicability both Europe elsewhere. Model contains components analysing situation which producers adjust promote national then incorporation 1

参考文章(27)
Bruce A. McCarl, Steven K. Rose, U.S. biomass supply for electricity generation: Climate policy implications and carbon neutrality Research Papers in Economics. ,(2010)
James S. Shortle, David G. Abler, Richard D. Horan, Research issues in nonpoint pollution control Environmental and Resource Economics. ,vol. 11, pp. 571- 585 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008276202889
Jeffrey M. Peterson, Richard N. Boisvert, Harry de Gorter, Multifunctionality and Optimal Environmental Policies for Agriculture in an Open Economy Research Papers in Economics. pp. 165- 192 ,(2004) , 10.1017/CBO9780511550676.022
John P Hoehn, Alan Randall, Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit Cost Test The American Economic Review. ,vol. 79, pp. 544- 551 ,(1989)
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, The Economics of Production The American Economic Review. ,vol. 60, pp. 1- 9 ,(1970)
A. Randall, Valuing the outputs of multifunctional agriculture European Review of Agriculture Economics. ,vol. 29, pp. 289- 307 ,(2002) , 10.1093/EURRAG/29.3.289
Jeffrey M. Peterson, Richard N. Boisvert, Incentive-Compatible Pollution Control Policies under Asymmetric Information on Both Risk Preferences and Technology American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 86, pp. 291- 306 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0092-5853.2004.00579.X
Ian Hodge, Agri‐environmental Pelationships and the Choice of Policy Mechanism The World Economy. ,vol. 23, pp. 257- 273 ,(2000) , 10.1111/1467-9701.00271
Brandt K Stevens, Fiscal implications of effluent charges and input taxes Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 15, pp. 285- 296 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0095-0696(88)90003-4
Stephen Coate, Stephen Morris, On the Form of Transfers to Special Interests Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 103, pp. 1210- 1235 ,(1995) , 10.1086/601449