Enhancing Socially Responsible Innovation in Industry: Practical Use for Considerations of Social and Ethical Aspects in Industrial Life Science & Technology
作者： S.M. Flipse
DOI: 10.4233/UUID:6D740180-9609-46CB-A403-7904F9A4B1D5
关键词: Quality (business) 、 Social responsibility 、 Knowledge management 、 Context (language use) 、 Field (Bourdieu) 、 Work (electrical) 、 Corporate social responsibility 、 Engineering
摘要: The aim of the study presented in this thesis is to explore what extent corporate researchers field industrial Life Science & Technology (LST) can consider social and ethical aspects LST innovation improve their Research Development (R&D) practices. Innovators, particularly those working controversial scientific technology fields such as LST, are encouraged adopt socially responsible methods. This requires that researchers, who work fields, broader context R&D activities. explores first how integrate daily could work. Second it investigates whether integration leads a quantitatively assessable improvement quality results indicate possible, measurable In addition, see number improvements work, e.g. communication cooperation, link own strategies marketing. be useful for innovators wish enhance practices, presents tool allows operationalisation management improved performance.
tudelft.nl参考文章(157)
Frank Vanclay, Conceptualising social impacts Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 22, pp. 183- 211 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6
Henk Verhoog, The responsibilities of scientists Minerva. ,vol. 19, pp. 582- 604 ,(1983) , 10.1007/BF01096194
Federico Neresini, Massimiano Bucchi, Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 20, pp. 64- 79 ,(2011) , 10.1177/0963662510388363
Steven M. Flipse, Maarten C. A. van der Sanden, Patricia Osseweijer, The Why and How of Enabling the Integration of Social and Ethical Aspects in Research and Development Science and Engineering Ethics. ,vol. 19, pp. 703- 725 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11948-012-9423-2
Jo Anne Shatkin, Informing Environmental Decision Making by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Analysis Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 12, pp. 278- 281 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1530-9290.2008.00031.X
M. A. P. Bovens, The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations ,(1998)
Brian Sager, Scenarios on the future of biotechnology Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 68, pp. 109- 129 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00107-4
A. Hoecht, P. Trott, Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing Technovation. ,vol. 26, pp. 672- 681 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2005.02.004
Anneloes Roelofsen, Wouter P.C. Boon, Roy R. Kloet, Jacqueline E.W. Broerse, Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: Learning how and what? Research Policy. ,vol. 40, pp. 341- 354 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2010.10.015
Yeou-Geng Hsu, Joseph Z. Shyu, Gwo-Hshing Tzeng, Policy tools on the formation of new biotechnology firms in Taiwan Technovation. ,vol. 25, pp. 281- 292 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00078-6