Detecting Subgroups in Online Discussions by Modeling Positive and Negative Relations among Participants

作者: Amjad Abu-Jbara , Dragomir Radev , Ahmed Hassan

DOI:

关键词: Cognitive psychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRelation (database)Polarity (physics)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionRepresentation (mathematics)DistrustSocial psychology (sociology)Machine learningSign (mathematics)Social media

摘要: A mixture of positive (friendly) and negative (antagonistic) relations exist among users in most social media applications. However, many such applications do not allow to explicitly express the polarity their interactions. As a result research has either ignored links or was limited few domains where are expressed (e.g. Epinions trust/distrust). We study text exchanged between online communities. find that can be predicted with high accuracy given they exchange. This allows us build signed network representation discussions; every edge sign: denote friendly relation, an antagonistic relation. also connect our analysis psychology theories balance. show automatically networks consistent those theories. Inspired by that, we present technique for identifying subgroups discussions partitioning singed representing them.

参考文章(39)
Claire Cardie, Mohit Bansal, Lillian Lee, The Power of Negative Thinking: Exploiting Label Disagreement in the Min-cut Classification Framework international conference on computational linguistics. pp. 15- 18 ,(2008)
Carmen Banea, Rada Mihalcea, Janyce M. Wiebe, A Bootstrapping Method for Building Subjectivity Lexicons for Languages with Scarce Resources language resources and evaluation. ,(2008)
Akiko Murakami, Rudy Raymond, Support or Oppose? Classifying Positions in Online Debates from Reply Activities and Opinion Expressions international conference on computational linguistics. pp. 869- 875 ,(2010)
Janyce Wiebe, Learning Subjective Adjectives from Corpora national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 735- 740 ,(2000)
Matt Thomas, Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts empirical methods in natural language processing. pp. 327- 335 ,(2006) , 10.3115/1610075.1610122
Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou, Janyce M. Wiebe, Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity international conference on computational linguistics. pp. 299- 305 ,(2000) , 10.3115/990820.990864
Theresa Wilson, Paul Hoffmann, Swapna Somasundaran, Jason Kessler, Janyce Wiebe, Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, Ellen Riloff, Siddharth Patwardhan, OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis empirical methods in natural language processing. pp. 34- 35 ,(2005) , 10.3115/1225733.1225751
Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, Paul Hoffmann, Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - HLT '05. pp. 347- 354 ,(2005) , 10.3115/1220575.1220619
Aaron Clauset, M. E. J. Newman, Cristopher Moore, Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E. ,vol. 70, pp. 066111- ,(2004) , 10.1103/PHYSREVE.70.066111