Aggressiveness as a component of fighting ability in pigs using a game-theoretical framework

作者: Irene Camerlink , Simon P. Turner , Marianne Farish , Gareth Arnott

DOI: 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2015.07.032

关键词: TraitBig Five personality traitsCONTESTAffect (psychology)PsychologySocial psychologyPersonalityAgonistic behaviourResource holding potentialAggression

摘要: Understanding animal contests has benefited greatly from employing the concept of fighting ability, termed resource-holding potential (RHP), with body size/weight typically used as a proxy. However, victory does not always go to larger/heavier contestant and existing RHP approach thereby fails accurately predict contest outcome. Aggressiveness, studied personality trait, might explain part this discrepancy. We investigated whether aggressiveness forms component RHP, examining effects on outcome, duration phases, plus physiological measures costs (lactate glucose). Furthermore, using correct theoretical framework, we provide first study investigate individuals gather use information an assessment strategy. Pigs, Sus scrofa, were assessed for in resident–intruder tests whereby attack latency reflects aggressiveness. Contests then staged between size-matched animals diverging Individuals short test almost initiated bite fight subsequent contest. had no direct effect whereas initiation did lead winning without escalated fight. This indirect suggests that is but rather signal intent. Winner loser affect or its separate suggesting A greater asymmetry prolonged displaying, which direction contrary models based morphological traits. Blood lactate glucose increased peaked during fights, highlighting utility proxies cost. Integrating traits into behaviour, illustrated here, will enhance our understanding subtleties agonistic interactions.

参考文章(84)
Mike Mesterton-Gibbons, Stephen M. Heap, Variation between Self- and Mutual Assessment in Animal Contests The American Naturalist. ,vol. 183, pp. 199- 213 ,(2014) , 10.1086/674443
ROBERT J.H PAYNE, MARK PAGEL, Why do animals repeat displays Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 54, pp. 109- 119 ,(1997) , 10.1006/ANBE.1996.0391
Mark Briffa, Robert W. Elwood, Rapid change in energy status in fighting animals : causes and effects of strategic decisions Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 70, pp. 119- 124 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2004.10.013
Randy J. Nelson, Brian C. Trainor, Neural mechanisms of aggression Nature Reviews Neuroscience. ,vol. 8, pp. 536- 546 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NRN2174
Szabolcs Számadó, Cheating as a mixed strategy in a simple model of aggressive communication. Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 59, pp. 221- 230 ,(2000) , 10.1006/ANBE.1999.1293
Romilson Silva Lopes Junior, Paulo Enrique Cardoso Peixoto, Males of the dragonfly Diastatops obscura fight according to predictions from game theory models Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 85, pp. 663- 669 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2012.12.033
Jeremy Hyman, Melissa Hughes, Territory owners discriminate between aggressive and nonaggressive neighbours Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 72, pp. 209- 215 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2006.01.007
Mark J. Garcia, Laura Paiva, Michelle Lennox, Boopathy Sivaraman, Stephanie C. Wong, Ryan L. Earley, Assessment Strategies and the Effects of Fighting Experience on Future Contest Performance in the Green Anole (Anolis carolinensis) Ethology. ,vol. 118, pp. 821- 834 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2012.02072.X
ROBERT J.H. PAYNE, Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 56, pp. 651- 662 ,(1998) , 10.1006/ANBE.1998.0835