INDIVIDUALANDCOOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT OF INVASIVESPECIES INHUMAN-MEDIATEDLANDSCAPES

作者: Rebecca S. Epanchin-Niell , James E. Wilen

DOI:

关键词: Total costControl (management)Discount pointsNatural resource economicsEconomicsActuarial scienceCost–benefit analysisScale (social sciences)IncentiveDamagesExternality

摘要: As a bioinvasion spreads across landscape from its point of introduction, damages rise roughly with the square distance original invasion. It is thus generally beneficial, at scale, to apply eradication or containment controls early if not immediately upon discovery. However, an individual property owner only has incentives consider costs and benefits control on his/her own rather than potential landscape-scale damages. Bioinvasions will therefore be under-controlled in independent owners operating under laissez-faire system. A mechanism needed induce cooperative contributions beneficiaries who would, without them, invaded later. We develop spatially-explicit, integrated model invasion spread human behavior examine how different degrees spatial cooperation affect patterns total imposed. compare laissez-faire, by adjacent neighbors, groups including more distant but nearby neighbors. expected, private decisions tend under-control relative socially optimal most circumstances. But reasonably high fraction first best payoffs can achieved modest geographical reach cooperation. also find that less extensive invasions whose otherwise lead largest externalities (circumstances are relatively low compared damages). This suggests even small amounts bioinvasions provide large social benefits.

参考文章(28)
Melanie B. Marks, Rachel T.A. Croson, The effect of incomplete information in a threshold public goods experiment Public Choice. ,vol. 99, pp. 103- 118 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1018316500800
N. Shigesada, K. Kawasaki, Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice ,(1997)
Mark Bagnoli, Barton L. Lipman, Provision of Public Goods: Fully Implementing the Core through Private Contributions The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 56, pp. 583- 601 ,(1989) , 10.2307/2297502
Karl M. Rich, Alex Winter-Nelson, Nicholas Brozović, Regionalization and foot-and-mouth disease control in South America: Lessons from spatial models of coordination and interactions The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. ,vol. 45, pp. 526- 540 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.QREF.2004.12.018
Kristine M. Grimsrud, Janie M. Chermak, Jason Hansen, Jennifer A. Thacher, Kate Krause, A two-agent dynamic model with an invasive weed diffusion externality: an application to Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) in New Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 89, pp. 322- 335 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2007.05.020
Mahadev G. Bhat, Ray G. Huffaker, Suzanne M. Lenhart, Controlling transboundary wildlife damage: modeling under alternative management scenarios Ecological Modelling. ,vol. 92, pp. 215- 224 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00169-7
Run Yu, Pingsun Leung, Optimal pest management: A reproductive pollutant perspective International Journal of Pest Management. ,vol. 52, pp. 155- 166 ,(2006) , 10.1080/09670870600774273
James E. Wilen, Economics of Spatial‐Dynamic Processes American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 89, pp. 1134- 1144 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1467-8276.2007.01074.X
Kohkichi Kawasaki, Fugo Takasu, Hal Caswell, Nanako Shigesada, How does stochasticity in colonization accelerate the speed of invasion in a cellular automaton model Ecological Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 334- 345 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11284-006-0166-X
Eli P. Fenichel, Timothy J. Richards, David W. Shanafelt, The Control of Invasive Species on Private Property with Neighbor-to-Neighbor Spillovers Environmental and Resource Economics. ,vol. 59, pp. 231- 255 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S10640-013-9726-Z