Who's Informed? An Analysis of Stock Ownership and Informed Trading

作者: Patrick J. Dennis

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.267350

关键词: Financial economicsControl variableAlgorithmic tradingAdverse selectionStock (geology)Alternative trading systemMarket makerEconomicsEconomies of scaleLiterature study

摘要: This paper examines the relationship between ownership structure and informed trading. We attempt to reconcile some puzzling results in recent empirical literature about the impact of ownership on informed trading using a comprehensive set of proxies for informed trading and a recent sample of firms from three U.S equity exchanges. As proxies for informed trading, we use four measures: (1) The relative spread, (2) the adverse selection component of the spread, constructed as in Huang and Stoll (1997), (3) the price impact of a trade, following Foster and Viswanathan (1993) and Hasbrouck (1991), and (4) the probability of informed trading constructed as in Easley, Kiefer, O'Hara and Paperman (1996). We find strong evidence of a cross-sectional relationship between our measures of informed trading and ownership by institutions and insiders. Our results are robust to a variety of estimation techniques, control variables, and proxies for informed trading. Overall, our results suggest that individual investors are less informed relative to institutions and insiders. These findings are consistent with economies of scale in information acquisition and aggregation, and with recent research that indicates that market makers move prices in response to trades by institutions.

参考文章(30)
Ananth Madhavan, George Sofianos, An empirical analysis of NYSE specialist trading1 Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 48, pp. 189- 210 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00008-7
Meeta Kothare, Paul A. Laux, Trading Costs and the Trading Systems for Nasdaq Stocks Financial Analysts Journal. ,vol. 51, pp. 42- 53 ,(1995) , 10.2469/FAJ.V51.N2.1880
William W. Jennings, Karen Schnatterly, Paul J. Seguin, Institutional ownership, information and liquidity Social Science Research Network. ,vol. 7, ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1569-3732(02)07003-2
Hans G. Heidle, Roger D. Huang, Information-Based Trading in Dealer and Auction Markets: An Analysis of Exchange Listings Social Science Research Network. ,(2001) , 10.2139/SSRN.287451
David Easley, Maureen O'Hara, PRICE, TRADE SIZE, AND INFORMATION IN SECURITIES MARKETS* Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 19, pp. 69- 90 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0304-405X(87)90029-8
BRETT TRUEMAN, A Theory of Noise Trading in Securities Markets Journal of Finance. ,vol. 43, pp. 83- 95 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1988.TB02590.X
JOHN AFFLECK-GRAVES, SHANTARAM P. HEGDE, ROBERT E. MILLER, Trading Mechanisms and the Components of the Bid‐Ask Spread Journal of Finance. ,vol. 49, pp. 1471- 1488 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1994.TB02462.X
Eli Bartov, Suresh Radhakrishnan, Itzhak Krinsky, Investor Sophistication and Patterns in Stock Returns after Earnings Announcements The Accounting Review. ,vol. 75, pp. 43- 63 ,(2000) , 10.2308/ACCR.2000.75.1.43
Roger D. Huang, Hans R. Stoll, The Components of the Bid-Ask Spread: A General Approach Review of Financial Studies. ,vol. 10, pp. 995- 1034 ,(1997) , 10.1093/RFS/10.4.995
Lawrence R Glosten, Lawrence E Harris, None, Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 21, pp. 123- 142 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0304-405X(88)90034-7