作者: Peter Cane
DOI:
关键词: Philosophy of law 、 Public law 、 Institutional approach 、 Law 、 Political science 、 Criminal law 、 Legal profession 、 Morality 、 Civil law (common law) 、 Private law
摘要: Lawyers who write about responsibility tend to focus on criminal law at the expense of civil and public law; while philosophers treat as a moral concept,and either ignore or consider legal be more less distorted reflection its counterpart. This book aims counteract both these biases. By adopting comparative institutional approach relationship between morality, it challenges common view that morality stands critical standard conventional practice. It shows how interact symbiotically, careful study concepts can add significantly our understanding generally. At heart this lie two questions: what does mean say we are responsible? And, responsibilities? Its aim is not answer questions but challenge some traditional approaches answering them importantly, suggest fruitful alternative take seriously.