Skin sensitization risk assessment: a comparative evaluation of 3 isothiazolinone biocides

作者: David A. Basketter , Rosemary Rodford , Ian Kimber , Ian Smith , Jan E. Wahlberg

DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1999.TB06013.X

关键词: PathologyHuman skinLocal lymph node assayRisk assessmentPotencyPharmacologyIsothiazolinonePatch testBenzisothiazolinoneSensitizationMedicine

摘要: Many of the chemicals in common use possess, to some degree, a capacity cause skin sensitization. Consequently, it is important conduct thorough and accurate risk assessment when can be anticipated that such are likely come into contact with human skin. Such assessments must consider nature extent dermal exposure together sensitizing potency chemical. Whilst elements process often well understood, or at least reasonably predicted on basis proposed usage chemical, determination may problematic. In this paper, we describe an approach relative 3 isothiazolinone biocides. Initially, local lymph node assay (LLNA) provides estimate potency. Where appropriate, followed by confirmatory testing repeat insult patch test (HRIPT). The data generated reveal (chloro)methyl (CMI) significantly stronger sensitizer than either methyl trimethylene (MTI) benzisothiazolinone (BIT). Furthermore, both LLNA HRIPT show consistently BIT somewhat weaker MTI. As additional component safety evaluation, ability these isothiazolinones cross-react has been considered; indicate more weakly do not elicit allergic reactions subjects sensitized MCI. implications for biocides various product types discussed.

参考文章(14)
D. A. Basketter, D. W. Roberts, M. Crown, The value of the local lymph node assay in quantitative structure-activity investigations. Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 27, pp. 137- 142 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1992.TB05241.X
K. E. Andersen, R. J. G. Rycroft, Recommended patch test concentrations for preservatives, biocides and antimicrobials. Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 25, pp. 1- 18 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1991.TB01766.X
Ian Kimber, David A. Basketter, Contact sensitization: A new approach to risk assessment Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. ,vol. 3, pp. 385- 395 ,(1997) , 10.1080/10807039709383695
David A. Basketter, Rebecca J. Dearman, Jennifer Hilton, Ian Kimber, Dinitrohalobenzenes: evaluation of relative skin sensitization potential using the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 36, pp. 97- 100 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1997.TB00421.X
Scott E. Loveless, Gregory S. Ladies, G.Frank Gerberick, Cindy A. Ryan, David A. Basketter, Edward W. Scholes, Robert V. House, Jennifer Hilton, Rebecca J. Dearman, Ian Kimber, Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial Toxicology. ,vol. 108, pp. 141- 152 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O
David Basketter, An Dooms-Goossens, Ann-Therese Karlberg, Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin, The chemistry of contact allergy: why is a molecule allergenic? Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 32, pp. 65- 73 ,(1995) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1995.TB00748.X
Philip A. Botham, Jennifer Hilton, Christopher D. Evans, David Lees, Tony J. Hall, Assessment of the relative skin sensitizing potency of 3 biocides using the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 25, pp. 172- 177 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1991.TB01823.X
Caroline W. Cardin, James E. Weaver, Paul T. Bailey, Dose‐response assessments of Kathon® biocide (II) Threshold prophetic patch testing Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 15, pp. 10- 16 ,(1986) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1986.TB01254.X
Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin, Studies in Patients With Corticosteroid Contact Allergy Archives of Dermatology. ,vol. 131, pp. 31- 37 ,(1995) , 10.1001/ARCHDERM.1995.01690130033006
D.A. Basketter, G. Cookman, G.F. Gerberick, N. Hamaide, M. Potokar, Skin sensitization thresholds: determination in predictive models Food and Chemical Toxicology. ,vol. 35, pp. 417- 425 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00129-4