US duration and local trial spacing affect autoshaped responding

作者: Gary A. Lucas , Edward A. Wasserman

DOI: 10.3758/BF03212289

关键词: Social psychologyClassical conditioningAudiologyPsychologyStimulus (physiology)Waiting timeUnconditioned stimulusPecking orderFixed length

摘要: The acquisition and maintenance of signal-directed pecking was examined in week-old Leg-Horn chicks responding to a keylight stimulus paired with heat. In contrast previous studies using pigeons food as the US, both speed asymptotic level keypecking were direct function US duration. Experiment 2 within-subject design isolate effects trial spacing on performance during immediate from following fixed length. These comparisons revealed significant effect intertriai interval (ITI), less after shorter intervals. different temporal apparent trial, but not trial. local ITI better predicted by recent autoshaping model based relative waiting time (Jenkins, Barnes, & Barrera, 1981) than expectancy (Gibbons Balsam, 1981). However, neither A reexamination US-duration literature suggested that diversity findings is consistent assumption conditioned an inverted U-shaped

参考文章(22)
J. Bruce Overmier, Differential Pavlovian fear conditioning as a function of the qualitative nature of the UCS: constant versus pulsating shock. Conditional reflex : a Pavlovian journal of research & therapy. ,vol. 3, pp. 175- 180 ,(1968) , 10.1007/BF03000128
Norma Wegner, David Zeaman, Strength of cardiac conditioned responses with varying unconditioned stimulus durations. Psychological Review. ,vol. 65, pp. 238- 241 ,(1958) , 10.1037/H0048318
W. N. Runquist, K. W. Spence, Performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of UCS duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 57, pp. 249- 252 ,(1959) , 10.1037/H0041629
Peter D. Balsam, David Payne, Intertrial interval and unconditioned stimulus durations in autoshaping Animal Learning & Behavior. ,vol. 7, pp. 477- 482 ,(1979) , 10.3758/BF03209705
Edward A. Wasserman, James D. Deich, Norman B. Hunter, Linda S. Nagamatsu, Analyzing the random control procedure: Effects of paired and unpaired CSs and USs on autoshaping the chick's key peck with heat reinforcement Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 8, pp. 467- 487 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0023-9690(77)90046-7
Nicholas Mackintosh, The psychology of animal learning ,(1974)
Edward A. Wasserman, Norman B. Hunter, Karen A. Gutowski, Sue A. Bader, Autoshaping Chicks with Heat Reinforcement: The Role of Stimulus-Reinforcer and Response-Reinforcer Relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. ,vol. 1, pp. 158- 169 ,(1975) , 10.1037//0097-7403.1.2.158
H. S. Terrace, J. Gibbon, C. W. Locurto, Charles C. Perkins, Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory ,(1980)