作者: Giuseppe Jurman , Davide Chicco , Valery Starovoitov
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068614
关键词: Matthews correlation coefficient 、 Correlation 、 Confusion matrix 、 F1 score 、 False positive paradox 、 Contingency table 、 Statistics 、 Diagnostic odds ratio 、 Binary classification 、 Mathematics
摘要: To assess the quality of a binary classification, researchers often take advantage four-entry contingency table called confusion matrix , containing true positives, negatives, false and negatives. recap four values in unique score, statisticians have developed several rates metrics. In past, scientific studies already showed why Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more informative trustworthy than confusion-entropy error, accuracy, F1 bookmaker informedness, markedness, balanced accuracy. this study, we compare MCC with diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), statistical rate employed sometimes biomedical sciences. After examining properties DOR, describe relationships between them, by also taking an innovative geometrical plot tetrahedron presented here for first time. We then report some use cases where DOR produce discordant outcomes, explain reliable two. Our results can strong impact computer science statistics, because they clearly trustworthiness information provided higher one generated ratio.