DOI: 10.1007/S10509-010-0303-4
关键词: Point (typography) 、 Epistemology 、 Physics 、 Natural (music)
摘要: The main point in Verheest & Pillay’s “Comment on Dust acoustic solitary waves dusty plasma with nonthermal ions”, against my article which appeared Astrophys. Space Sci. 324, 41–45 (2009) is that the authors had published a more complete than above manuscript about year and half earlier. They conclude Pakzad did not survey mainstream literature before publishing manuscript. Here are some suggestions may help to revise their opinion. A short examination of previous articles by reveals natural expansion his works. paper mainly deals conditions for existence medium containing electrons. As stated this manuscript, widely applicable—independent double layer situation has been investigated nice work collaborators. In fact Pakzad’s both parallel (and also independent of) very presented et al. referee our considered his/her final decision. To find works surprising news view recent knowledge specially physics. One can all cited below have same problems as after work.