An improved two-stage variance balance approach for constructing partial profile designs for discrete choice experiments

作者: Roselinde Kessels , Bradley Jones , Peter Goos

DOI: 10.1002/ASMB.2065

关键词: Software developmentMathematicsVariance (accounting)EconometricsCognitionBayesian probabilitySet (psychology)GeneralizationProduct innovationVariable and attributeStatistics

摘要: In many discrete choice experiments set up for product innovation, the number of attributes is large, which results in a substantial cognitive burden respondents. To reduce such cases, Green suggested early '70s use partial profiles that vary only levels subset attributes. this paper, we present two new methods constructing Bayesian D-optimal profile designs estimating main-effects models. They involve alternative generalizations Green's approach makes balanced incomplete block and take into account fact may have differing numbers levels. We refer to our as variance balance I II because they an attribute with larger more often than fewer stabilize variances individual part-worth estimates. The differ way are weighted. Both provide statistically efficient another generalization does not weight This method called balance. show from actual experiment software development demonstrating usefulness methods. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(35)
Jordan Louviere, Deborah J. Street, Leonie Burgess, A 20+ Years’ Retrospective on Choice Experiments Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 201- 214 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-0-387-28692-1_9
Roselinde Kessels, Bradley Jones, Peter Goos, Martina Vandebroek, The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. ,vol. 27, pp. 173- 188 ,(2011) , 10.1002/ASMB.906
Benedict G.C. Dellaert, Bas Donkers, Arthur Van Soest, Complexity effects in choice experiment-based models Journal of Marketing Research. ,vol. 49, pp. 424- 434 ,(2012) , 10.1509/JMR.09.0315
Heinz Holling, Rainer Schwabe, ‘The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments’ by Roselinde Kessels, Bradley Jones, Peter Goos and Martina Vandebroek Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. ,vol. 27, pp. 189- 192 ,(2011) , 10.1002/ASMB.904
Eric T. Bradlow, Current issues and a ‘wish list’ for conjoint analysis Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. ,vol. 21, pp. 319- 323 ,(2005) , 10.1002/ASMB.559
Ulrike Graßhoff, Heiko Großmann, Heinz Holling, Rainer Schwabe, Optimal designs for main effects in linear paired comparison models Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. ,vol. 126, pp. 361- 376 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JSPI.2003.07.005
John M. Rose, ‘The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments’ by R. Kessels, B. Jones, P. Goos and M. Vandebroek Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. ,vol. 27, pp. 193- 196 ,(2011) , 10.1002/ASMB.882
Ulrike Grasshoff*, Heiko Grossmann†, Heinz Holling‡, Rainer Schwabe, Optimal paired comparison designs for first-order interactions Statistics. ,vol. 37, pp. 373- 386 ,(2003) , 10.1080/0233188031000154812
Keith Chrzan, Using Partial Profile Choice Experiments to Handle Large Numbers of Attributes International Journal of Market Research. ,vol. 52, pp. 827- 840 ,(2010) , 10.2501/S1470785310201673