Switch 2.0: A Modern Platform for Planning High-Renewable Power Systems

作者: Matthias Fripp , Josiah Johnston , Benjamín Maluenda , Rodrigo Henríquez

DOI: 10.1016/J.SOFTX.2019.100251

关键词: Investment (macroeconomics)Computer scienceRenewable energyDemand responseProduction costElectric powerGridInvestment decisionsCapacity planningSmart gridIndustrial engineeringPower system simulationHydroelectricity

摘要: This paper describes Switch 2.0, an open-source modeling platform for planning transitions to low-emission electric power grids, designed satisfy 21st century grid requirements. is capable of long-, medium- and short-term investments operations with conventional or smart integrating large shares renewable power, storage and/or demand response. Applications include integrated resource planning, investment economic policy analyses as well basic research. Potential users researchers, educators, industry regulators. formulates generation transmission capacity a mixed integer linear program where operation are co-optimized across sampled time series during multiple periods. High-resolution production cost supported by freezing decisions including longer more operational details. Modeling features unit commitment, part-load efficiency, operating reserves, fuel supply curves, storage, hydroelectric networks, constraints has modular architecture that allows flexibly compose models choosing built-in modules 'a la carte' writing custom modules. the software model formulation 2.0 provides case study in which was used identify best options obtaining load-shifting reserve services from batteries response 100% system.

参考文章(8)
Sonja Wogrin, Pablo Duenas, Andres Delgadillo, Javier Reneses, A New Approach to Model Load Levels in Electric Power Systems With High Renewable Penetration IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. ,vol. 29, pp. 2210- 2218 ,(2014) , 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2300697
Katrin Schaber, Florian Steinke, Thomas Hamacher, Transmission grid extensions for the integration of variable renewable energies in Europe: Who benefits where? Energy Policy. ,vol. 43, pp. 123- 135 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2011.12.040
Niamh O׳Connell, Pierre Pinson, Henrik Madsen, Mark O׳Malley, Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 39, pp. 686- 699 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2014.07.098
Cedric De Jonghe, Benjamin F. Hobbs, Ronnie Belmans, Optimal Generation Mix With Short-Term Demand Response and Wind Penetration IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. ,vol. 27, pp. 830- 839 ,(2012) , 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2174257
N.P. Padhy, Unit Commitment—A Bibliographical Survey IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. ,vol. 19, pp. 1196- 1205 ,(2004) , 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821611
Alexander E. MacDonald, Christopher T. M. Clack, Anneliese Alexander, Adam Dunbar, James Wilczak, Yuanfu Xie, Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 526- 531 ,(2016) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2921
Nikolaos G. Paterakis, Ozan Erdinç, João P.S. Catalão, An overview of Demand Response: Key-elements and international experience Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 69, pp. 871- 891 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2016.11.167
Tom Brown, Jonas Hörsch, David Schlachtberger, PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis Journal of open research software. ,vol. 6, ,(2018) , 10.5334/JORS.188