作者: J. W. Gair
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_13
关键词: Small clause 、 Markedness 、 Linguistics 、 Universal grammar 、 Sociology 、 Language acquisition 、 Grammar 、 Phonology 、 Syntax 、 Generative grammar
摘要: Markedness. under one conception or the other, has been a part of linguistics since 1930s, when it was introduced by Troubetzkoy into phonological theory. The notion that is involved in some intimate way with language acquisition can be traced back to Jakobson (1941), who, relating primarily phonology, developed theory which unmarked elements exhibit “first in, last out” order first and aphasia, respectively. In recent work, this linkage once more assumed importance, but attention focused on syntax, informed quite different linked Chomskian concept Universal Grammar (UG). This renewed concern received expression 1979 volume reflecting proceedings GLOW Conference Pisa. Theory Markedness Generative (Beletti, Brandi Rizzi, 1979) particularly paper Noam Chomsky entitled “Markedness Core Grammar,” as well subsequent work others. More recently, there have initial, probing attempts extend connection second (L2) well, exemplified varying degrees papers section, contributors others (see bibliography).A wide range definitions markedness expressed implied all they not always either self-evident unvaryingly clear.1