Addressing Geographic Disparities in Liver Transplantation Through Redistricting

作者: S. E. Gentry , A. B. Massie , S. W. Cheek , K. L. Lentine , E. H. Chow

DOI: 10.1111/AJT.12301

关键词: DemographySurgeryDisease severityPotential impactMortality rateDonationLiver transplantationTransplantationMedicineRedistrictingLiver disease

摘要: Severe geographic disparities exist in liver transplantation; for patients with comparable disease severity, 90-day transplant rates range from 18% to 86% and death 14% 82% across donation service areas (DSAs). Broader sharing has been proposed resolve inequity; however, we hypothesized that the efficacy of broader depends on partitions used. To determine potential impact redistricting disparity severity at transplantation, combined existing DSAs into novel regions using mathematical optimization. Optimized maps current were evaluated Liver Simulated Allocation Model. Primary analysis was based 6700 deceased donors, 28 063 candidates, 242 727 Model End-Stage Disease (MELD) changes 2010. Fully regional within map would paradoxically worsen (variance MELD transplantation increases 11.2 13.5, p = 0.021), although it decrease waitlist deaths (from 1368 1329, p = 0.002). In contrast, an optimized significantly reduce (to 7.0, p = 0.002) while achieving a larger 1307, Redistricting optimization, but not alone, allocation livers United States.

参考文章(15)
A. B. Massie, B. Caffo, S. E. Gentry, E. C. Hall, D. A. Axelrod, K. L. Lentine, M. A. Schnitzler, A. Gheorghian, P. R. Salvalaggio, D. L. Segev, MELD Exceptions and Rates of Waiting List Outcomes American Journal of Transplantation. ,vol. 11, pp. 2362- 2371 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1600-6143.2011.03735.X
Paul H. Hayashi, David A. Axelrod, Joseph Galanko, Paolo R. Salvalaggio, Mark Schnitzler, Regional differences in deceased donor liver transplantation and their implications for organ utilization and allocation Clinical Transplantation. ,vol. 25, pp. 156- 163 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1399-0012.2010.01214.X
Nan Kong, Andrew J. Schaefer, Brady Hunsaker, Mark S. Roberts, Maximizing the Efficiency of the U.S. Liver Allocation System Through Region Design Management Science. ,vol. 56, pp. 2111- 2122 ,(2010) , 10.1287/MNSC.1100.1249
J. P. Roberts, D. M. Dykstra, N. P. Goodrich, S. H. Rush, R. M. Merion, F. K. Port, Geographic Differences in Event Rates by Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease Score American Journal of Transplantation. ,vol. 6, pp. 2470- 2475 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1600-6143.2006.01508.X
Sumeet K. Asrani, W. Ray Kim, Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade. Clinics in Liver Disease. ,vol. 15, pp. 685- 698 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.CLD.2011.08.009
Mehmet C. Demirci, Andrew J. Schaefer, H. Edwin Romeijn, Mark S. Roberts, An Exact Method for Balancing Efficiency and Equity in the Liver Allocation Hierarchy Informs Journal on Computing. ,vol. 24, pp. 260- 275 ,(2012) , 10.1287/IJOC.1110.0445
D. E. Schaubel, M. K. Guidinger, S. W. Biggins, J. D. Kalbfleisch, E. A. Pomfret, P. Sharma, R. M. Merion, Survival Benefit‐Based Deceased‐Donor Liver Allocation American Journal of Transplantation. ,vol. 9, pp. 970- 981 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1600-6143.2009.02571.X
Heidi Yeh, Elizabeth Smoot, David A. Schoenfeld, James F. Markmann, Geographic Inequity in Access to Livers for Transplantation Transplantation. ,vol. 91, pp. 479- 486 ,(2010) , 10.1097/TP.0B013E3182066275
James E. Stahl, Nan Kong, Steven M. Shechter, Andrew J. Schaefer, Mark S. Roberts, A methodological framework for optimally reorganizing liver transplant regions Medical Decision Making. ,vol. 25, pp. 35- 46 ,(2005) , 10.1177/0272989X04273137
Kenneth Washburn, Elizabeth Pomfret, John Roberts, Liver allocation and distribution: Possible next steps Liver Transplantation. ,vol. 17, pp. n/a- n/a ,(2011) , 10.1002/LT.22349