Situating Science in the Social Context by Cross-Sectoral Collaboration
作者： Jenni Metcalfe , Michelle Riedlinger , Anne Pisarski
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_11
关键词: Cross sectoral 、 Knowledge management 、 Science communication 、 Engineering ethics 、 Social environment 、 Social science education 、 Outline of social science 、 Political science 、 The arts 、 Value (ethics)
摘要: Research collaboration is increasingly interdisciplinary, with those working in traditional fields of science, technology, engineering and medicine recognizing the value humanities, arts social sciences. This chapter explores challenges opportunities for communication within from cross-sectoral research teams. The authors draw examples researched case studies to describe how positions science context. They also look at relates current models communication.
springer.com
uq.edu.au
core.ac.uk 参考文章(24)
A Pisarski, M J Gardner, J. Metcalfe, M. Riedlinger, CHASS Occasional Paper No. 3: Collaborating across the sectors: The relationship between the humanities, arts and social sciences (HASS) and science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) sectors Council for Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. pp. 1- 116 ,(2006)
Dennis McCarty, Sara J. Lamb, Merwyn R. Greenlick, Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Research: Forging Partnerships with Community-Based Drug and Alcohol Treatment ,(2013)
Craft Australia, The Prime Minister's Science, Engineering and Innovation Council (PMSEIC) is the Australian Government's principal source of independent advice on issues in science, engineering and innovation. PMSEIC has chosen The Role of Creativity in the Innovation Economy as a major topic for presentation at its 14th meeting scheduled for late 2005. Avi Amesbury. ,(2005)
Tjempaka Sari Hartomo, Julian Cribb, Sharing Knowledge: A Guide to Effective Science Communication ,(2002)
Alan Irwin, Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development ,(1995)
Martin W. Bauer, Nick Allum, Steve Miller, What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 16, pp. 79- 95 ,(2007) , 10.1177/0963662506071287
Madison Public Schools (Wis.). Department of Curriculum Development, Science and Society ,(1969)
Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology Technology and Culture. ,vol. 39, pp. 338- ,(1996) , 10.1017/CBO9780511563737
Iain Wilkinson, The House Of Lords Select Committee for Science and Technology. Their report on complementary and alternative medicine and its implications for reflexology Complementary Therapies in Nursing and Midwifery. ,vol. 8, pp. 91- 100 ,(2002) , 10.1054/CTNM.2002.0614
Renee A. Irvin, John Stansbury, Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review. ,vol. 64, pp. 55- 65 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1540-6210.2004.00346.X