Too early is too soon: lessons from the Montana Department of Corrections early release program

作者: Kevin A. Wright , Jeffrey W. Rosky

DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-9133.2011.00765.X

关键词: Poison controlState (polity)WrightPrisonSuicide preventionOvercrowdingComputer securityAdministration (government)Public administrationGovernmentEngineering

摘要: Intheir seminal work,Reaffirming Rehabilitation, Cullen andGilbert (1982: 176) issued a warning that “in the face of teeming penitentiaries, alternative release procedures could and undoubtedly will be evolved. Yet these adaptations are likely to hastily instituted create new inefficiencies inequalities in administration justice.” Nearly three decades later, their premonition has proved correct as state correctional administrators have struggled efforts combat “incompatible powerful forces” (Cullen, Wright, Applegate, 1996: 70) underfunding overcrowding (see, e.g., Lane, 1986). Indeed, by year-end 2009, 19 states federal government had prison systems operating at more than 100% highest inmate capacity with 27 lowest (West, Sabol, andGreenman, 2010).1 Additionally, current economic crisis led significant, across-the-board cuts seemingly untouchable sphere budgets (Engel, Larivee, Luedeman, 2009). The task, then, is for researchers, policy makers, practitioners find ways alleviate strains without compromising goals corrections or safety general public.

参考文章(55)
The Social Ecology of Crime Contemporary Sociology. ,vol. 16, pp. 845- ,(1986) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-8606-3
James Austin, Using Early Release to Relieve Prison Crowding: A Dilemma in Public Policy Crime & Delinquency. ,vol. 32, pp. 404- 502 ,(1986) , 10.1177/0011128786032004004
Travis W. Franklin, Cortney A. Franklin, Travis C. Pratt, Examining the empirical relationship between prison crowding and inmate misconduct: A meta-analysis of conflicting research results Journal of Criminal Justice. ,vol. 34, pp. 401- 412 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCRIMJUS.2006.05.006
James Austin, Reducing America's Correctional Populations: A Strategic Plan Justice Research and Policy. ,vol. 12, pp. 9- 40 ,(2010) , 10.3818/JRP.12.1.2010.9