On the Graded Acceptability of Arguments in Abstract and Instantiated Argumentation

作者: Sanjay Modgil , Davide Grossi

DOI:

关键词: SemanticsStructure (mathematical logic)Computer scienceTheoryContext (language use)GeneralizationSemantics (computer science)Argumentation frameworkArgumentation theoryTheoretical computer scienceArgument

摘要: The paper develops a formal theory of the degree justification arguments, which relies solely on structure an argumentation framework, and can be successfully interfaced with approaches to instantiated argumentation. is developed in three steps. First, introduces graded generalization two key notions underpinning Dung's semantics: self-defense conflict-freeness. This leads natural semantics, whereby standard extensions are weakened or strengthened depending level conflict-freeness they meet. investigates fixpoint these establishing existence results for them. Second, shows how semantics readily provide approach argument rankings, offering novel contribution recently growing research programme ranking-based semantics. Third, this ranking applied studied context frameworks, so doing shown account simple form accrual arguments within Dung paradigm. Finally, compared detail existing approaches.

参考文章(32)
Sanjay Modgil, Martin Caminada, Proof Theories and Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks Applied Artificial Intelligence. pp. 105- 129 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_6
João Leite, João Martins, Social abstract argumentation international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 2287- 2292 ,(2011) , 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-381
Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim, Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks scalable uncertainty management. pp. 134- 147 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_11
Paul-Amaury Matt, Francesca Toni, A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation european conference on logics in artificial intelligence. pp. 285- 297 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_24
Gerhard Brewka, Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 1043- 1048 ,(1989)
Hengfei Li, Nir Oren, Timothy J. Norman, Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation. pp. 1- 16 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_1
Philippe Besnard, Anthony Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 128, pp. 203- 235 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00071-6
Sanjay Modgil, Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 173, pp. 901- 934 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2009.02.001
Henry Prakken, A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning international conference on artificial intelligence and law. pp. 85- 94 ,(2005) , 10.1145/1165485.1165500
Davide Grossi, Abstract argument games via modal logic Synthese. ,vol. 190, pp. 5- 29 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11229-012-0237-1