Religious views on the origin and meaning of COVID-2019

作者: Christina Landman , Tanya Pieterse

DOI: 10.4102/HTS.V77I3.6283

关键词: SociologyRhetorical questionTheodicyEnvironmental ethicsSocial mediaContext (language use)NarrativeNarrative inquiryRationalityMeaning (existential)

摘要: For ages, natural disasters, war and disease have been part of life, sharing themes not only adversity, fear death, but also hope. The year 2020 brought a new threat in the form coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), which challenged what humankind understood all they knew believed. significant difference today is role media news opinions on this that threatens lives, spiritual well-being. In study, we focus people’s religious views origin meaning invisible to establish how pandemic impacts belief systems. 20th century was marked by shift whereby actions events are intellectualised rationalise cause effect, philosophical theodicies regarded limit our critical reasoning. This however, shows COVID-19 reactivates debate it surpasses logic rational thinking. Data collected means comments, discussions shared numerous social platforms. During times same rhetorical ‘who’ ‘why’ questions asked regard, theodicy as framework informs study. Applying narrative inquiry, data interpreted three identified, namely an act God, has nothing do with God remains control amidst devastating pandemic. sample for study random medium used allows representativity terms age group (18+), gender, race, affiliation South Africa, limited country. Contribution: article provides insight into renewed debates pandemics suffering context COVID-19. It contributes understanding different perceptions disease, people make sense find being global discourse.

参考文章(17)
D. Clandinin, Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology SAGE Publications, Inc.. ,(2007) , 10.4135/9781452226552
Gilchrist F. Mushwana, Hannes C. Bezuidenhout, Social media policy in South Africa Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 63- 74 ,(2014)
David K. Chester, Angus M. Duncan, The Bible, theodicy and Christian responses to historic and contemporary earthquakes and volcanic eruptions Environmental Hazards. ,vol. 8, pp. 304- 332 ,(2009) , 10.3763/EHAZ.2009.0025
Ernst M. Conradie, HIV/AIDS AND HUMAN SUFFERING: WHERE ON EARTH IS GOD? Scriptura. ,vol. 89, pp. 406- 432 ,(2005) , 10.7833/89-0-1027
David Morgan, Iain Wilkinson, The Problem of Suffering and the Sociological Task of Theodicy European Journal of Social Theory. ,vol. 4, pp. 199- 214 ,(2001) , 10.1177/13684310122225073
Mark Stephen Murray Scott, None, Theodicy at the margins: New trajectories for the problem of evil Theology Today. ,vol. 68, pp. 149- 152 ,(2011) , 10.1177/0040573611405878
D. Jean Clandinin, Narrative Inquiry: A Methodology for Studying Lived Experience Research Studies in Music Education. ,vol. 27, pp. 44- 54 ,(2006) , 10.1177/1321103X060270010301
Jan A. du Rand, The Mystery in Theodicy Neotestamentica. ,vol. 50, pp. 167- 186 ,(2016) , 10.1353/NEO.2016.0023