Critical notice of Aaron James, Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy

摘要: Nobody has offered such a comprehensive philosophical approach to trade. Nonetheless, James's does not succeed. First, we explore constructivist method, which less work than he suggests. The second topic is take on the different ‘grounds’ of justice. We shortcomings approaches that focus exclusively Our third why James thinks trade ground. fourth how argues for his proposed ‘structural equity.’ This proposal remains under-argued. fifth structural equity would generate several specific principles. Finally, discuss notion autarky. Autarky sets benchmark ideas about divide gains doubt it can do so.