Rival Versions of Objective Spirit

作者: Mark Alznauer

DOI: 10.1017/HGL.2016.16

关键词: Teleological argumentEpistemologySocial dimensionArgumentAestheticsSocial institutionPhilosophyHegelianism

摘要: To assert the primacy of objective spirit is to claim that certain distinctively human capacities, such as thinking and acting, are not capacities we have individuals considered singly but in some way dependent on shared public norms or social institutions. In this essay, I provide a brief history arguments for from Hegel present, identifying three distinct strategies defending thesis: teleological argument, sociological argument quasi-transcendental argument. Although it has now become quite common read advancing one similar found Wittgenstein’s famous remarks about ‘rule-following’, show Hegel’s most interesting claims dimensions mindedness incompatible with strategy can only be vindicated if he offering

参考文章(38)
Toula. Nicolacopoulos, George. Vassilacopoulos, Paul. Ashton, The Spirit of the Age: Hegel and the Fate of Thinking re.press. ,(2008)
Jonathan Lear, Barry Stroud, The Disappearing ‘We’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 58, pp. 219- 258 ,(1984) , 10.1093/ARISTOTELIANSUPP/58.1.219
Alfredo Ferrarin, Hegel and Aristotle ,(2001)
Paul Redding, The logic of affect ,(1999)
Mark Alznauer, Hegel's Theory of Responsibility ,(2015)
Frederick C. Beiser, The German Historicist Tradition ,(2012)
Richard Kraut, Aristotle: Political Philosophy ,(2002)