作者: Marije de Jong , Frank Kupper , Anneloes Roelofsen , Jacqueline Broerse
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_4
关键词: Negotiation 、 Grand Challenges 、 Engineering ethics 、 Anticipation (artificial intelligence) 、 Justice (ethics) 、 Meaning (linguistics) 、 Operationalization 、 Autonomy 、 Context (language use) 、 Political science 、 Knowledge management
摘要: Although responsible innovation (RI) is to change the scientific system meet grand challenges of our time, its criteria are still unclear. This study explores meaning negotiation on RI by academic actors in both formal and informal discourse. In discourse RI, we identified characteristic shifts, including engagement societal stakeholders, anticipation adaptability, broadening, new insights impacts regulation. However, intended group scientists themselves were not visibly involved discussion. Therefore, as a case study, studied Dutch field functional neuroimaging relevant domain justice security. Our findings show that unfamiliar scientists. We suggest guiding concept need operationalization within specific context which it used. A point entry for such process role responsibility taken Resistance can be expected equivocated with limitation autonomy science. To avoid evasive practices, extra efforts needed involve co-constructive operationalize RI.