Green Electricity From Biomass, Part I: Environmental Impacts of Direct Life Cycle Emissions
作者： Sonja Siegl , Michael Laaber , Peter Holubar
DOI: 10.1007/S12649-011-9077-3
关键词: Engineering 、 Manure 、 Biomass 、 Environmental engineering 、 Energy crop 、 Life-cycle assessment 、 Impact assessment 、 Combustion 、 Anaerobic digestion 、 Digestate
摘要: For the evaluation of environmental impacts direct life cycle emissions resulting from electricity generation biomass, various biomass conversion technologies (anaerobic digestion [five different plant types], combustion and gasification) are investigated on basis data existing plants in Austria. The analyzed accordance with ISO 14040 for assessment (LCA). impact CML 2001 base line approach covering 11 categories is used. results show how stages dominate emission profile that dominant differ depending technology. difference between up to a factor 12. In climate change, acidification eutrophication, anaerobic considerably higher than gasification due differences nature co-products (digestate or ash). LCA potentials improvement which could achieve reductions 10 50% certain categories. Based unweighed aggregation all results, comparison shows ranking led by using mainly energy crops, wood chips, primarily manure followed other types plants.
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(28)
HA Haes, H de Bruijn, R van Duin, MAJ Huijbregts, Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards ,(2001)
G. Rebitzer, T. Ekvall, R. Frischknecht, D. Hunkeler, G. Norris, T. Rydberg, W.-P. Schmidt, S. Suh, B.P. Weidema, D.W. Pennington, Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications Environment International. ,vol. 30, pp. 701- 720 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2003.11.005
Ingwald Obernberger, Decentralized biomass combustion: state of the art and future development Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 14, pp. 33- 56 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00034-2
Adisa Azapagic, Roland Clift, None, Allocation of environmental burdens in co-product systems: Product-related burdens (Part 1) International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 4, pp. 357- 369 ,(1999) , 10.1007/BF02978528
Sebastian Wulf, Peter Jäger, Helmut Döhler, Balancing of greenhouse gas emissions and economic efficiency for biogas-production through anaerobic co-fermentation of slurry with organic waste Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 112, pp. 178- 185 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2005.08.017
Francesco Cherubini, Anders Hammer Strømman, Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 102, pp. 437- 451 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2010.08.010
Martina Pöschl, Shane Ward, Philip Owende, Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways Applied Energy. ,vol. 87, pp. 3305- 3321 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2010.05.011
Anoop Singh, Deepak Pant, Nicholas E. Korres, Abdul-Sattar Nizami, Shiv Prasad, Jerry D. Murphy, Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and perspectives. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 101, pp. 5003- 5012 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2009.11.062
B. Amon, V. Kryvoruchko, T. Amon, S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 112, pp. 153- 162 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2005.08.030
S.G. Sommer, Ammonia volatilization from farm tanks containing anaerobically digested animal slurry Atmospheric Environment. ,vol. 31, pp. 863- 868 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00250-6