Pendulum Swings in Wolf Management Led to Conflict, Illegal Kills, and a Legislated Wolf Hunt

作者: Erik R. Olson , Jennifer L. Stenglein , Victoria Shelley , Adena R. Rissman , Christine Browne-Nuñez

DOI: 10.1111/CONL.12141

关键词: Political economyEnvironmental resource managementEndangered speciesPoachingWildlife conservationPolitical scienceWildlife managementWildlifeNorth American Model of Wildlife ConservationLegislationState management

摘要: Rapid change in wildlife populations can challenge managers to promote species conservation while maintaining public support for wildlife. Wolf management during recolonization Wisconsin, United States demonstrates the complexities of inconsistent authority, attitudes, and illegal killing wolves. State authority control depredating wolves oscillated a period intense sociopolitical conflict over wolf status under federal Endangered Species Act. We demonstrate that swings led declining local wolves, possibly unintended backlash more kills legislatively mandated hunt. A new Wildlife Management Matrix illustrates an idealized relationship between lethal options perceptions Moderating drivers policy short periods is essential allow greater flexibility achieving species-specific goals. To our knowledge, this research provides first demonstrated link Act, suggests behavior may be moderated with responsible effective programs. recommend states avoid prescriptive harvest legislation, we suggest incremental shift from state authority.

参考文章(31)
Ronald L. Refsnider, The Role of the Endangered Species Act in Midwest Wolf Recovery Recovery of Gray Wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States. pp. 311- 329 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-0-387-85952-1_20
L. David Mech, Robert G. Haight, Laurel E. Travis, Kevin Nimerfro, Computer simulation of wolf-removal strategies for animal damage control Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 30, pp. 844- 852 ,(2002)
M. W. Brunson, Robert H. Schmidt, D. K. Reiter, Public Attitudes Toward Wildlife Damage Management and Policy Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 27, pp. 746- 758 ,(1999)
Jeremy T. Bruskotter, John A. Vucetich, Sherry Enzler, Adrian Treves, Michael P. Nelson, Removing Protections for Wolves and the Future of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (1973) Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 401- 407 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12081
ADRIAN TREVES, LISA NAUGHTON-TREVES, VICTORIA SHELLEY, Longitudinal Analysis of Attitudes Toward Wolves Conservation Biology. ,vol. 27, pp. 315- 323 ,(2013) , 10.1111/COBI.12009
Bjørn P. Kaltenborn, Tore Bjerke, Julius W. Nyahongo, Daniel R. Williams, Animal Preferences and Acceptability of Wildlife Management Actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 15, pp. 4633- 4649 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S10531-005-6196-9
Holly Doremus, Joel E. Pagel, Why Listing May Be Forever: Perspectives on Delisting under the U.S. Endangered Species Act Conservation Biology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1258- 1268 ,(2001) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2001.00178.X
Luigi Boitani, Paolo Ciucci, Elisabetta Raganella-Pelliccioni, Ex-post compensation payments for wolf predation on livestock in Italy: a tool for conservation? Wildlife Research. ,vol. 37, pp. 722- 730 ,(2010) , 10.1071/WR10029
W. R. Irvin, Endangered Species Act Science. ,vol. 259, pp. 443- 443 ,(1993) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.259.5094.443
Harry C. Zinn, Michael J. Manfredo, Jerry J. Vaske, Karin Wittmann, Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions Society & Natural Resources. ,vol. 11, pp. 649- 662 ,(1998) , 10.1080/08941929809381109