Reliability of OperaVOX against Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP).

作者: M. Mat Baki , G. Wood , M. Alston , P. Ratcliffe , G. Sandhu

DOI: 10.1111/COA.12313

关键词: Significant differenceConfidence intervalAudiologyIntraclass correlationHealthy volunteersReliability studyReliability (statistics)University teachingInternal consistencyMedicine

摘要: Objective To evaluate the agreement between OperaVOX and MDVP. Design Cross sectional reliability study. Setting University teaching hospital. Methods Fifty healthy volunteers 50 voice disorder patients had supervised recordings in a quiet room using by iPod's internal microphone with sampling rate of 45 kHz. A five-seconds recording vowel/a/was used to measure fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR). All 21 second recording. The recorded voices were also analysed MDVP. inter- intrasoftware was intraclass correlation (ICC) test Bland–Altman (BA) method. Mann–Whitney compare acoustic parameters patients. Results Nine severe aperiodic voice. ICC high confidence interval >0.75 for except NHR. For intersoftware BA analysis, excluding data sets, bias (95% LOA) F0, NHR 0.81 (11.32, −9.71); −0.13 (1.26, −1.52); −0.52 (1.68, −2.72); 0.08 (0.27, −0.10). reliability, it −1.48 (18.43, −21.39); 0.05 (1.31, −1.21); −0.01 (2.87, −2.89); 0.005 (0.20, −0.18), respectively. Normative from obtained. There significant difference all measured Opera-VOX (P < 0.001) F0 females (P = 0.87). Conclusion OperaVOX is comparable MDVP has consistency measuring jitter

参考文章(26)
Fang Chunying, Li Haifeng, Ma Lin, Zhang Xiaopeng, Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Pathological Voices Intelligent Computing Theories and Technology. pp. 401- 409 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-3-642-39482-9_46
Ilse Smits, Piet Ceuppens, Marc S. De Bodt, A Comparative Study of Acoustic Voice Measurements by Means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab Journal of Voice. ,vol. 19, pp. 187- 196 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JVOICE.2004.03.004
James Lee, David Koh, CN Ong, None, Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Computers in Biology and Medicine. ,vol. 19, pp. 61- 70 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0010-4825(89)90036-X
P. H. Dejonckere, Patrick Bradley, Pais Clemente, Guy Cornut, Lise Crevier-Buchman, Gerhard Friedrich, Paul Van De Heyning, Marc Remacle, Virginie Woisard, A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology. ,vol. 258, pp. 77- 82 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S004050000299
Meike Brockmann-Bauser, Michael J Drinnan, Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again? Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. ,vol. 19, pp. 165- 170 ,(2011) , 10.1097/MOO.0B013E32834575FE
Ana Clara Naufel de Felippe, Maria Helena Marotti Martelletti Grillo, Thaís Helena Grechi, Normatização de medidas acústicas para vozes normais Revista Brasileira De Otorrinolaringologia. ,vol. 72, pp. 659- 664 ,(2006) , 10.1590/S0034-72992006000500013
Wei Wang, Donghui Chen, Shicai Chen, Ding Li, Meng Li, Siwen Xia, Hongliang Zheng, Laryngeal Reinnervation Using Ansa Cervicalis for Thyroid Surgery-Related Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Long-Term Outcome Analysis of 237 Cases PLoS ONE. ,vol. 6, pp. e19128- ,(2011) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0019128
Ofer Amir, Michael Wolf, Noam Amir, A clinical comparison between two acoustic analysis softwares: MDVP and Praat Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. ,vol. 4, pp. 202- 205 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BSPC.2008.11.002
Berit Schneider-Stickler, Johannes Gaechter, Wolfgang Bigenzahn, Long-term results after external vocal fold medialization thyroplasty with titanium vocal fold medialization implant (TVFMI). European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology. ,vol. 270, pp. 1689- 1694 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00405-013-2416-1
Emily Lin, Jeremy Hornibrook, Tika Ormond, Evaluating iPhone recordings for acoustic voice assessment. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica. ,vol. 64, pp. 122- 130 ,(2012) , 10.1159/000335874