Systematic transperineal ultrasound-guided template biopsy of the prostate: Three-year experience

作者: David M. Pinkstaff , Todd C. Igel , Steven P. Petrou , Gregory A. Broderick , Michael J. Wehle

DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2004.10.067

关键词: ProstateUrinary retentionBiopsyIntraepithelial neoplasiaProstate biopsyUrologyMedicineProstatectomySampling (medicine)Prostate cancer

摘要: Abstract Objectives To review the technique of transperineal saturation prostate biopsy and to update our results on patients at high risk cancer. Methods A total 210 men who met study inclusion criteria underwent systematic ultrasound-guided template prostate. All had previously undergone least one set transrectal biopsies 170 (81%) two or more. The mean number cores obtained before was 17.4. 21.2 (range 12 41) were biopsy, depending size. included prostate-specific antigen level 10 ng/mL greater, velocity 0.75 per year presence prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and/or atypical small cell acinar proliferation previous biopsy. Results Adenocarcinoma detected in 78 (37%). Cancer transition zone 60 (77%) these men, including 36 (46%) whom cancer identified uniquely zone. Gleason sum 6 3 9) most common grade. Thirty radical prostatectomy, 27 (90%) pathologic Stage pT2 disease as final stage. Complications from limited postprocedural urinary retention 11% patients. Conclusions provides uniform sampling entire This appears enhance identification cancers not by adenocarcinoma.

参考文章(24)
Kathryn K. Hodge, John E. McNeal, Martha K. Terris, Thomas A. Stamey, Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 142, pp. 71- 74 ,(1989) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38664-0
Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Michel Bazinet, Armen G. Aprikian, Claude Trudel, Samuel Aronson, Mahmoud Nachabé, François Péloquint, Jean Dessureault, Michelle S. Goyal, Louis R. Bégin, Mostafa M. Elhilali, Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume Urology. ,vol. 49, pp. 55- 59 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00360-3
Jonathan I. Epstein, Patrick C. Walsh, Jurga Sauvageot, H. Ballentine Carter, USE OF REPEAT SEXTANT AND TRANSITION ZONE BIOPSIES FOR ASSESSING EXTENT OF PROSTATE CANCER Journal of Urology. ,vol. 158, pp. 1886- 1890 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64159-4
M. Norberg, L. Egevad, L. Holmberg, P. Sparén, B.J. Norlén, C. Busch, The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer Urology. ,vol. 50, pp. 562- 566 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00306-3
PRODROMOS G. BORBOROGLU, STEWART W. COMER, ROBERT. H. RIFFENBURGH, CHRISTOPHER L. AMLING, EXTENSIVE REPEAT TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS BENIGN SEXTANT BIOPSIES The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 163, pp. 158- 162 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67994-3
Nicholas Stroumbakis, Michael S. Cookson, Victor E. Reuter, William R. Fair, Clinical significance of repeat sextant biopsies in prostate cancer patients Urology. ,vol. 49, pp. 113- 118 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00178-7
Prodromos G. Borboroglu, Roger L. Sur, James L. Roberts, Christopher L. Amling, Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 166, pp. 866- 870 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65853-3
CHRISTOPHER S. STEWART, BRADLEY C. LEIBOVICH, AMY L. WEAVER, MICHAEL M. LIEBER, PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS USING A SATURATION NEEDLE BIOPSY TECHNIQUE AFTER PREVIOUS NEGATIVE SEXTANT BIOPSIES The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 166, pp. 86- 92 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66083-1
Michael E Chen, Patricia Troncoso, Kuang Tang, R.Joseph Babaian, Dennis Johnston, Comparison of prostate biopsy schemes by computer simulation. Urology. ,vol. 53, pp. 951- 960 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00639-6
JOSEPH C. PRESTI, JAMES J. CHANG, VIVEK BHARGAVA, KATSUTO SHINOHARA, THE OPTIMAL SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY SCHEME SHOULD INCLUDE 8 RATHER THAN 6 BIOPSIES: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL TRIAL The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 163, pp. 163- 167 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67995-5