Editorial: The governance of adaptation to climate change as a multi-level, multi-sector and multi-actor challenge: a European comparative perspective

作者: Art Dewulf , Sander Meijerink , Hens Runhaar

DOI: 10.2166/WCC.2014.000

关键词: Land-use planningEuropean unionCorporate governanceEconomicsEconomic systemPolitical economy of climate changeSocial changeClimate changeAdaptive capacityEnvironmental resource managementAgriculture

摘要: There is increasing recognition of the need for society to adapt impacts climate change, especially in water sector. Adaptation climatic involves both infrastructural adjustments, such as reinforcing dykes or creating storage capacity, and broader processes societal adjusting land use planning, more efficient agricultural transitions. Because many uncertainties surrounding change issues, actors are facing challenge developing implementing adjustments transitions, adaptive capacity deal with unexpected future changes. Although ‘mitigation’ has traditionally received bulk European media policy attention; since, a number years, countries have been national adaptation strategies concrete policies cope (Biesbroek et al. 2010). More recently, Union launched its strategy package on April 2013. Different taken different inroads into governing this relatively new issue over past decade, so it seems timely relevant take stock assess what can be learned from comparing ways which EU approached governance change. The aim special not ‘assess’ current state play Europe (e.g. by evaluating terms progress outcomes). This addressed other studies 2010; Environment Agency 2014; Massey 2014), ambition. Our interest facets adaptation, referring interactions arrangements between public and/or private that aimed at purposefully steering …

参考文章(34)
Jan Kooiman, Governing as Governance ,(2002)
J. F. Supple-Green, Grahame Thompson, Jeremy Mitchell, Rosalind Levačić, Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life ,(1991)
Catrien Termeer, Art Dewulf, Scale-sensitivity as a governance capability: observing, acting and enabling Scale-sensitive governance of the environment. pp. 38- 55 ,(2014) , 10.1002/9781118567135.CH3
Camilla Adelle, Duncan Russel, Climate Policy Integration: a Case of Déjà Vu? Environmental Policy and Governance. ,vol. 23, pp. 1- 12 ,(2013) , 10.1002/EET.1601
David W. Cash, W. Neil Adger, Fikret Berkes, Po Garden, Louis Lebel, Per Olsson, Lowell Pritchard, Oran Young, Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World Ecology and Society. ,vol. 11, pp. 8- ,(2006) , 10.5751/ES-01759-110208
Hens Runhaar, Peter Driessen, Caroline Uittenbroek, Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy Integration Environmental Policy and Governance. ,vol. 24, pp. 233- 246 ,(2014) , 10.1002/EET.1647
Matthew Cashmore, Anja Wejs, Constructing Legitimacy for Climate Change Planning: A Study of Local Government in Denmark Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 24, pp. 203- 212 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2013.09.019
Maartje Van Lieshout, Art Dewulf, Noelle Aarts, Catrien Termeer, The Power to Frame the Scale? Analysing Scalar Politics over, in and of a Deliberative Governance Process Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. ,vol. 19, pp. 550- 573 ,(2017) , 10.1080/1523908X.2014.936581
Trude Rauken, Per Kristen Mydske, Marte Winsvold, Mainstreaming climate change adaptation at the local level Local Environment. ,vol. 20, pp. 408- 423 ,(2015) , 10.1080/13549839.2014.880412
Heleen L.P. Mees, Peter P.J. Driessen, Hens A.C. Runhaar, Jennifer Stamatelos, Who governs climate adaptation? Getting green roofs for stormwater retention off the ground Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. ,vol. 56, pp. 802- 825 ,(2013) , 10.1080/09640568.2012.706600