CO2–oil minimum miscibility pressure model for impure and pure CO2 streams

作者: Eissa M. El-M. Shokir

DOI: 10.1016/J.PETROL.2006.12.001

关键词: Enhanced oil recoveryMineralogyThermodynamicsApproximation errorEnhanced recoveryMiscibilityMoleChemistry

摘要: Abstract CO2 injection processes are among the effective methods for enhanced oil recovery. A key parameter in design of project is minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), whereas local displacement efficiency from highly dependent on MMP. From an experimental point view, slim tube displacements, and rising bubble apparatus (RBA) tests routinely determine Because such experiments very expensive time-consuming, searching fast robust mathematical determination CO2–oil MMP usually requested. It well recognized that depends upon purity CO2, composition, reservoir temperature. This paper presents a new model predicting impure pure effects impurities The alternating conditional expectation (ACE) algorithm was used to estimate optimal transformation maximizes correlation between transformed variable (CO2–oil MMP) sum independent variables. These variables temperature (TR), compositions (mole percentage volatile components (C1 N2), mole intermediate (C2–C4, H2S CO2), molecular weight C5+ (MWC5+)), non-CO2 N2, C1, C2–C4, H2S) injected CO2. validity this successfully approved by comparing results slim-tube calculated common correlations. yielded accurate prediction with lowest average relative absolute error all tested In addition, could be at higher fractions components.

参考文章(40)
Richard A. Harmon, Reid B. Grigg, Vapor-density measurement for estimating minimum miscibility pressure Spe Reservoir Engineering. ,vol. 3, pp. 1215- 1220 ,(1988) , 10.2118/15403-PA
LeRoy W. Holm, Virgil A. Josendal, Effect of Oil Composition on Miscible-Type Displacement by Carbon Dioxide Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. ,vol. 22, pp. 87- 98 ,(1982) , 10.2118/8814-PA
Y.F. Huang, G.H. Huang, M.Z. Dong, G.M. Feng, Development of an artificial neural network model for predicting minimum miscibility pressure in CO2 flooding Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. ,vol. 37, pp. 83- 95 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0920-4105(02)00312-1
J.L. Shelton, L. Yarborough, Multiple Phase Behavior in Porous Media During CO2 or Rich-Gas Flooding Journal of Petroleum Technology. ,vol. 29, pp. 1171- 1178 ,(1977) , 10.2118/5827-PA
Mohammed K. Emera, Hemanta K. Sarma, Use of genetic algorithm to estimate CO2–oil minimum miscibility pressure—a key parameter in design of CO2 miscible flood Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. ,vol. 46, pp. 37- 52 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.PETROL.2004.10.001
James P. Johnson, James S. Pollin, Measurement And Correlation Of CO2 Miscibility Pressures SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium. ,(1981) , 10.2118/9790-MS
Richard L. Christiansen, Hiemi Kim Haines, Rapid measurement of minimum miscibility pressure with the rising-bubble apparatus Spe Reservoir Engineering. ,vol. 2, pp. 523- 527 ,(1987) , 10.2118/13114-PA
O. Glaso, Generalized minimum miscibility pressure correlation Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. ,vol. 25, pp. 927- 934 ,(1985) , 10.2118/12893-PA
B.E. Eakin, F.J. Mitch, Measurement and Correlation of Miscibility Pressures of Reservoir Oils Software - Practice and Experience. ,(1988) , 10.2118/18065-MS