The new arboretum of Indo-European “trees”. Can new algorithms reveal the phylogeny and even prehistory of Indo-European?*

作者: Hans J. Holm

DOI: 10.1080/09296170701378916

关键词: PrehistoryBioinformaticsPhylogeneticsInformaticsSpecialization (functional)GeographyLinguisticsData AppliedLinguistics and LanguageLanguage and Linguistics

摘要: Abstract Specialization in linguistics vs. biological informatics leads to widespread misunderstandings and false results caused by poor knowledge of the essential conditions respective methods data applied. These are analyzed insights used assess recent glut attempts employ from establishing new phylogenies Indo-European languages.

参考文章(57)
Bernhard Wiesemüller, Hartmut Rothe, Winfried Henke, Phylogenetische Systematik : Eine Einführung ,(2003)
Maryellen Ruvolo, 10 Reconstructing Genetic and Linguistic Trees: Phenetic and Cladistic Approaches University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 193- 216 ,(1987) , 10.9783/9781512802450-012
W. P. Lehmann, Walter Porzig, Die Gliederung des indogermanischen Sprachgebiets Language. ,vol. 30, pp. 461- ,(1954) , 10.2307/410469
Hans Fricke, Coelacanths: the first that time forgot National Geographic. ,vol. 173, pp. 825- 838 ,(1988)
Quentin D. Atkinson, Russell D. Gray, Are Accurate Dates an Intractable Problem for Historical Linguistics? Mapping Our Ancestors. pp. 269- 296 ,(2017) , 10.4324/9780203786376-16
Isidore Dyen, Joseph B. Kruskal, Paul Black, An Indoeuropean Classification: A Lexicostatistical Experiment Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. ,vol. 82, pp. iii- ,(1992) , 10.2307/1006517
William Labov, Principles of Linguistic Change ,(1994)