Decoupling of excitation and receive coils in pulsed magnetic resonance using sinusoidal magnetic field modulation.

作者: Mark Tseytlin , Boris Epel , Subramanian Sundramoorthy , Dmitriy Tipikin , Howard J. Halpern

DOI: 10.1016/J.JMR.2016.09.004

关键词: Electromagnetic coilNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryExcitationMagnetic fluxDecoupling (electronics)ResonatorSpin echoAtomic physicsLarmor precessionPulsed EPR

摘要: In pulsed magnetic resonance, the excitation power is many orders of magnitude larger than that induced by spin system in receiving coil or resonator. The receiver must be protected during and immediately after pulse to allow for energy stored resonator dissipate a safe level. time which signal not detected, instrumental dead-time, can shortened using magnetically decoupled receive coils. Such coils are oriented, with respect each other, way minimizes total flux produced one other. We suggest isolated degree tuning them separate frequencies. Spins excited at frequency, echo detected another. Sinusoidal field modulation rapidly changes Larmor frequency spins between detection events used ensure resonance conditions both this study, relaxation times trityl-CD3 were measured field-modulated EPR experiment compared results obtained standard method. tuned 245 256.7MHz, respectively. Using an available rapid-scan, cross-loop resonator, we demonstrated isolation improvement approximately 20-30dB due decoupling. Theoretical analysis, numerical simulations, proof-of-concept experiments substantial excitation-detection decoupling achieved. A L-band system, including small volume bi-modal equipped coils, was constructed demonstrate fivefold dead-time reduction comparison experiment. This achieved detuning 26MHz sinusoidal 480kHz.

参考文章(19)
Gunnar Jeschke, A. Schweiger, Principles of pulse electron paramagnetic resonance ,(2001)
Mark Tseitlin, Richard W. Quine, George A. Rinard, Sandra S. Eaton, Gareth R. Eaton, Digital EPR with an arbitrary waveform generator and direct detection at the carrier frequency Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 213, pp. 119- 125 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JMR.2011.09.024
Josef Dadok, Richard F Sprecher, Correlation NNW spectroscopy Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 13, pp. 243- 248 ,(1974) , 10.1016/0022-2364(74)90013-4
Janhavi P. Joshi, John R. Ballard, George A. Rinard, Richard W. Quine, Sandra S. Eaton, Gareth R. Eaton, Rapid-scan EPR with triangular scans and fourier deconvolution to recover the slow-scan spectrum. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 175, pp. 44- 51 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JMR.2005.03.013
Rüdiger-A. Eichel, Arthur Schweiger, Electron-Zeeman Resolved Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 152, pp. 276- 287 ,(2001) , 10.1006/JMRE.2001.2414
Raj K Gupta, James A Ferretti, Edwin D Becker, Rapid scan Fourier transform NMR spectroscopy Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 13, pp. 275- 290 ,(1974) , 10.1016/0022-2364(74)90022-5
Mark Tseitlin, George A. Rinard, Richard W. Quine, Sandra S. Eaton, Gareth R. Eaton, Deconvolution of sinusoidal rapid EPR scans. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 208, pp. 279- 283 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JMR.2010.11.015
Deborah G Mitchell, Mark Tseitlin, Richard W Quine, Virginia Meyer, Mark E Newton, Alexander Schnegg, Benjamin George, Sandra S Eaton, Gareth R Eaton, None, X-band rapid-scan EPR of samples with long electron spin relaxation times: A comparison of continuous wave, pulse and rapid-scan EPR Molecular Physics. ,vol. 111, pp. 2664- 2673 ,(2013) , 10.1080/00268976.2013.792959
Subramanian V. Sundramoorthy, Boris Epel, Howard J. Halpern, Orthogonal resonators for pulse in vivo electron paramagnetic imaging at 250 MHz Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 240, pp. 45- 51 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JMR.2013.12.015